Skip to main content

Is privy.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Privy Reviews

privy.io favicon

Is privy.io Safe? Security Analysis for Privy

Check if privy.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
FramerGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:58:26 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Privy is a technology company specializing in wallet infrastructure designed for scalability. Their platform focuses on securely onboarding, activating, and managing users at scale, targeting businesses and developers requiring wallet solutions. The website is built using modern front-end technology (Framer) and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies suggests gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture appears limited based on the lack of detected security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which is common for privacy-conscious companies but reduces domain transparency. Overall, the website is professional and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

FramerGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Privy operates in the technology sector with a focus on wallet infrastructure as a B2B SaaS provider. Their business model centers on providing scalable user onboarding and management services. The company appears to be small-sized with no public information on founding year or parent/subsidiary relationships. The website content is consistent and professionally branded, targeting developers and businesses needing wallet infrastructure. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests active marketing and analytics efforts. Lack of contact information and compliance documentation may impact trust and customer confidence. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level of the website is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which may indicate compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL), but SSL configuration details are unknown. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture requires improvement to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Privy

Description:

Securely onboard, activate, and manage your users at scale.

Key Services:
User onboardingUser activationUser management at scale
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

45/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:re+dlfencfyx4h@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:privy.io
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/27/2025 (81 days)
SANs:privy.io, *.privy.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(29 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dolly.ns.cloudflare.com
marek.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382476328, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:358ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and prototyping tool, indicating a contemporary front-end approach. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, which supports marketing and user behavior analysis. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a good design quality with clear navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. Hosting provider and backend technologies are not identifiable from the provided data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of external scripts and large font assets. Technical debt appears low but could be improved with enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Analyze Another Website