Skip to main content

Is processwebsitedata.com a Scam? Security Check Results - processwebsitedata.com Reviews

P

Is processwebsitedata.com Safe? Security Analysis for processwebsitedata.com

Check if processwebsitedata.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:17:55 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at processwebsitedata.com/lander currently serves as a minimal placeholder or parking page with no substantive business content or user engagement features. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC since 2015, indicating a mature domain age, but the website itself lacks any visible business information, contact details, or policies. The technical infrastructure relies on basic JavaScript and CSS assets loaded from wsimg.com and Google Adsense scripts, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and no DNSSEC enabled. Privacy and compliance features such as privacy policy, cookie consent, and terms of service are not present, limiting trust and regulatory adherence. Overall, the site appears to be inactive or under development, with low content quality and minimal user interaction.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of visible business content, no clear market positioning, business model, or target audience can be identified. The domain's longevity suggests potential for a legitimate business presence, but no competitive advantages or key services are disclosed. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The absence of contact information and policies further limits business credibility and customer trust. The site likely serves as a placeholder or is awaiting further development.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal and requires significant improvement. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data. HTTPS status is unknown but recommended to be enforced. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The site currently poses low risk but also offers limited security assurances to visitors.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal with no visible text or business information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(355 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.130.190, 15.197.148.33
Name Servers:
ns45.domaincontrol.com
ns46.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
0: smtp.secureserver.net
10: mailstore1.secureserver.net
SOA:Serial: 2023091900, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:437ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic JavaScript and CSS assets served from wsimg.com and includes Google Adsense scripts for advertising. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The hosting provider is GoDaddy.com, LLC, based on WHOIS data. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content, but SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of metadata and content. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tag present but no further enhancements. The site is minimal and likely a parking page, indicating technical debt or incomplete deployment.
Analyze Another Website