Skip to main content

Is projectcounter.org a Scam? Security Check Results - COUNTER Metrics Reviews

projectcounter.org favicon

Is projectcounter.org Safe? Security Analysis for COUNTER Metrics

Check if projectcounter.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/amedium
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Font Awesome+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:44:10 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

COUNTER Metrics is a professional organization providing the global standard for usage metrics, primarily serving librarians and publishers. The website positions itself as a trusted source for standardized usage data, supporting the information needs of its target audience. The business model revolves around standardization and industry collaboration, with a focus on delivering reliable metrics. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Font Awesome, and is hosted with CDN support for performance. SEO and mobile optimization are well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and privacy opt-out mechanisms, but lacks some security headers and explicit policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which impacts domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Font AwesomejQuerySlick CarouselCloudfront CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization holds a strong market position as the global standard for usage metrics, trusted by librarians and publishers worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its recognized standard and industry acceptance. The business model is centered on providing standardized metrics rather than direct commercial services. The target customers are institutions involved in library and publishing sectors. Growth indicators include ongoing updates and active social media presence. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes industry stakeholders. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving transparency and compliance to strengthen credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and privacy opt-out configurations for analytics. However, the absence of security headers and explicit security policies reduces its security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

COUNTER Metrics

Description:

Delivering the standard for usage metrics

Key Services:
usage metrics standardization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Font AwesomejQuerySlick CarouselCloudfront CDN
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Consent Mode implemented
  • Privacy opt-out mode configured

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

35/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:62.100.206.179
Name Servers:
ns-1170.awsdns-18.orgDNS only
ns-157.awsdns-19.comDNS only
ns-1909.awsdns-46.co.ukDNS only
ns-627.awsdns-14.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:390ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Font Awesome icons, and jQuery. It uses a CDN (Cloudfront) for content delivery, contributing to moderate performance. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts to reduce impact on performance. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but adding security headers and improving accessibility would strengthen the technical posture.
Analyze Another Website