Skip to main content

Is projecthoneypot.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Unspam Technologies, Inc. Reviews

projecthoneypot.org favicon

Is projecthoneypot.org Safe? Security Analysis for Unspam Technologies, Inc.

Check if projecthoneypot.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 7:31:18 PM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Project Honey Pot is an established, community-driven open-source project operated by Unspam Technologies, Inc., focused on tracking and combating online fraud, spam harvesters, and abuse. The website serves as a platform for website administrators and security professionals to monitor and mitigate spam and abuse threats. The project has a long operational history dating back to 2004 and maintains a strong market position as a leading anti-spam community resource. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and is protected by Cloudflare with HTTPS enabled, ensuring secure access. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, though privacy compliance could be improved with cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and Cloudflare protection, but lacks some security headers and formal incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and provides valuable services to its target audience.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector with a focus on cybersecurity and anti-spam services. Its business model is community-centric, leveraging distributed participation to collect and share data on spam and abuse. Revenue streams likely include donations, merchandise sales (via CafePress), and possibly service subscriptions. The target customers are website administrators and security professionals seeking to protect their sites from spam and abuse. The company has a clear partnership with its parent company Unspam Technologies, Inc. The website's longevity and consistent branding indicate stable operations and a trusted position in the market. However, the lack of explicit contact emails and phone numbers may limit direct customer engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced and Cloudflare provides site protection, which mitigates many common threats. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy exists but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Unspam Technologies, Inc.

Description:

A free, distributed, open-source project to help website administrators track, stop, and prosecute spam harvesters stealing email addresses from their sites.

Key Services:
Spam harvester trackingIP data monitoringStatistics on spam and abuseServices overview for anti-spam tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare for site protection

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:209.124.55.38 ip4:209.124.55.42 ip4:66.114.104.102 ip4:209.124.55.53 ip4:66.114.104.70 ip4:66.114.104.69 ip4:209.124.55.48 ip4:209.124.55.47 ip4:74.208.194.182 ip4:87.106.253.228 ip4:209.124.55.40 ip4:209.124.55.44 ip6:2001:8d8:83b:b4bb:dd aa:9c1c:af70:0 ip6:2607:f1c0:827:2d00::71:e547 ip6:2600:3000:2401:4003::3 ip6:2607:f790:ffff:ff20::4 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1272-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.projecthoneypot.org
Issuer:GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2023
Valid Until:2/11/2026 (193 days)
SANs:*.projecthoneypot.org, projecthoneypot.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(315 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:209.124.55.40
AAAA Records:2607:f790:ffff:ff20::4
Name Servers:
ns23.domaincontrol.com
ns24.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
20: mail.projecthoneypot.org
10: mail.nospamregistry.org
SOA:Serial: 2024062500, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:87ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:209.124.55.38 ip4:209.124.55.42 ip4:66.114.104.102 ip4:209.124.55.53 ip4:66.114.104.70 ip4:66.114.104.69 ip4:209.124.55.48 ip4:209.124.55.47 ip4:74.208.194.182 ip4:87.106.253.228 ip4:209.124.55.40 ip4:209.124.55.44 ip6:2001:8d8:83b:b4bb:dd aa:9c1c:af70:0 ip6:2607:f1c0:827:2d00::71:e547 ip6:2600:3000:2401:4003::3 ip6:2607:f790:ffff:ff20::4 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) with no detected CMS or complex frameworks. It uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking and is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security services. The site loads with moderate performance and basic mobile responsiveness. There is room for improvement in SEO optimization and accessibility features. The technical infrastructure is stable and appropriate for the site's community-driven model but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website