Skip to main content

Is promotion.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - promotion.lv Reviews

P

Is promotion.lv Safe? Security Analysis for promotion.lv

Check if promotion.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:29:32 PM
37
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website promotion.lv presents minimal content, limited to basic contact information including a Latvian phone number, an email address, and a physical address in Riga, Latvia. There is no detailed business description, branding, or service information available on the site. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents verification of domain registration details, which limits the ability to assess the legitimacy and history of the domain. Technically, the site appears to be a simple static page generated by Microsoft Word with legacy charset encoding, lacking modern web technologies or CMS frameworks. No HTTPS or security headers are detected, indicating a weak security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no forms or tracking scripts are present, suggesting minimal data collection or user interaction.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the sparse content and absence of business details, the site likely represents a small local business or a placeholder page rather than a mature commercial entity. The contact information suggests a Latvian local presence, but no further insights into market positioning, business model, or partnerships can be derived. The lack of certifications, trust indicators, or social media presence further limits the business intelligence profile. The site does not appear to engage in advertising or analytics activities.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

e*****@promotion.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712613****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is poor. The absence of HTTPS means data transmitted to and from the site is not encrypted, exposing users to potential interception. No security headers are present to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the site does not follow basic security best practices, which poses risks to user trust and data protection.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

No business description or services detailed on the page. Contact info only.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mail2.my-hosting.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:159.148.49.241
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail2.my-hosting.lv
SOA:Serial: 1664376665, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mail2.my-hosting.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built as a simple static HTML page with no detected CMS or modern frameworks. The charset is set to windows-1257, which is outdated and may cause encoding issues. There are no external scripts, analytics, or advertising technologies detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but could be improved with modern standards. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and outdated.
Analyze Another Website