Skip to main content

Is proprojekts.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - PRO Projekts Reviews

proprojekts.lv favicon

Is proprojekts.lv Safe? Security Analysis for PRO Projekts

Check if proprojekts.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TelecommunicationsLatviasmall
WordPressElementorYoast SEOjQuerySlick Carousel+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:47:30 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

PRO Projekts is a Latvian engineering company specializing in the design of electronic communication, fire safety, and automation systems. The company targets businesses and organizations requiring modern telecommunication and safety infrastructure solutions. Their website demonstrates a professional digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring a portfolio of over 60 projects and multiple client testimonials, indicating a solid local market position. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and includes analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers are missing and privacy policy documentation is absent. Overall, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, but lacks WHOIS transparency due to query limits preventing domain registration verification.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOjQuerySlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelreCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the telecommunications and fire safety sectors, providing essential engineering design services. Their business model focuses on project-based engineering solutions with a strong emphasis on client satisfaction and timely delivery. The presence of multiple partner architecture and engineering firms as clients suggests a collaborative ecosystem and a reputable standing in the local market. The company appears to be small-sized with a focused service offering and a growing portfolio. Revenue streams likely derive from engineering project contracts and consulting services. The website content and client references indicate steady growth and a professional approach to business development.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@proprojekts.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712002****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a cookie consent banner, but the absence of a privacy policy is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small engineering firm but could be improved with better header implementation and policy disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

PRO Projekts

Description:

Elektronisko sakaru sistēmas, ugunsdrošības sistēmas, vadības un automatizācijas sistēmas. Telekomunikāciju un ugunsdrošības projektēšana.

Key Services:
Electronic communication systems designFire safety systems designControl and automation systems designTelecommunication infrastructure design
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOjQuerySlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelreCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:95.217.235.108
Name Servers:
ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns2.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns3.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns4.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: proprojekts-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It leverages jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive elements and includes Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, some accessibility improvements could be made. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website suitable for the company's business needs.
Analyze Another Website