Skip to main content

Is protected.media a Scam? Security Check Results - Protected Media Reviews

protected.media favicon

Is protected.media Safe? Security Analysis for Protected Media

Check if protected.media is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsjQuery+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:14:07 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Protected Media is a specialized media technology company focused on redefining ad verification services. As part of the Mediaocean family, it benefits from the backing of a global leader in mission-critical media technology. The company offers a suite of services including brand safety, invalid traffic detection, viewability and attention metrics, supply intelligence, and integrations with Mediaocean’s Prisma platform. Their solutions target advertisers, agencies, and brands seeking to optimize media spend and ensure quality in programmatic advertising. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional and consistent brand presence, supported by industry certifications such as MRC accreditation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsjQueryFont AwesomeSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Protected Media positions itself strongly within the digital advertising ecosystem by leveraging its affiliation with Mediaocean and offering comprehensive ad verification and media intelligence solutions. The business model is B2B SaaS and technology services, focusing on data-driven insights to reduce waste and improve campaign performance. The company actively participates in industry events like Programmatic IO 2025, indicating engagement with the market and clients. The presence of client logos and detailed solution pages suggests a mature partnership ecosystem and a focus on enterprise clients. The lack of direct contact emails but presence of contact forms aligns with standard B2B practices.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, indicating a good baseline security and privacy posture. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and there is no publicly available incident response or security policy page. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt is a minor gap. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit security policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Protected Media

Description:

Protected Media Redefines Ad Verification. Part of the Mediaocean family, a global leader in mission-critical media technology.

Key Services:
Ad VerificationBrand SafetyIVT DetectionViewability & AttentionSupply IntelligenceIntegration with Mediaocean’s PrismaProtected Passport for closed environmentsReporting SuiteNative Innovid Integration
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsjQueryFont AwesomeSwiper.js
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.251.168, 15.197.225.128
Name Servers:
ns77.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns78.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025082700, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS infrastructure. It uses common libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome, and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Analyze Another Website