Skip to main content

Is protectmichild.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Michigan Secretary of State Reviews

protectmichild.com favicon

Is protectmichild.com Safe? Security Analysis for Michigan Secretary of State

Check if protectmichild.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesmedium
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:52:42 PM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ProtectMIChild is an official Michigan government website operated by the Michigan Secretary of State's office. It provides a free registry service allowing Michigan parents to register their children's electronic contact points to block adult-themed and inappropriate content from reaching them. The service targets families within Michigan and aims to protect children from exposure to ads related to alcohol, tobacco, gambling, and pornography. The website is positioned as a trusted government resource with clear branding and official endorsements. Technically, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site is moderately optimized for performance and accessibility but lacks advanced mobile responsiveness and modern SEO features. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. However, security headers and HTTPS configuration details were not available, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. From a security perspective, the site shows no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of security policies, incident response contacts, and cookie consent mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and user privacy transparency. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which is unusual for an official government domain and may indicate privacy protection or registry issues. Despite this, the website content and linked official domains strongly support its legitimacy. Overall, ProtectMIChild presents a trustworthy and valuable government service with good business credibility but could enhance its technical and security implementations. Strategic improvements in HTTPS enforcement, security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency are recommended to strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ProtectMIChild operates as a government service under the Michigan Secretary of State, targeting parents and families in Michigan. Its competitive advantage lies in being an official state-backed registry that helps block inappropriate electronic content for children. The business model is service-oriented, providing free registration and compliance tools for digital advertisers. Revenue streams are likely government-funded rather than commercial. The target customer segment is Michigan residents with children. The partnership ecosystem includes official Michigan government domains and support services. Growth indicators are not explicit but the service aligns with increasing digital safety concerns. Operationally, the site is straightforward with limited technical complexity, focusing on accessibility and ease of use.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and published security policies indicates compliance gaps. There is no evidence of GDPR or other privacy regulation adherence beyond a basic privacy policy link. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated through contact channels or security.txt files. The security culture appears minimal but adequate for a government informational site. Enhancements in secure communications, header implementation, and privacy transparency would improve the security posture significantly.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and ensure all pages load securely.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Michigan Secretary of State

Description:

The Michigan Children's Protection Registry website allows Michigan parents to register their children's electronic contact points for protection from inappropriate messages.

Key Services:
Child electronic contact point registrationBlocking adult-themed contentCompliance center for digital advertisersComplaint filing against advertisers
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is an official Michigan government service for child protection registry

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a:mail.nospamregistry.org a:mail1.nospamregistry.org ip4:68.142.140.133 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1272-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:a81c8048@mxtoolbox.dmarc-report.com
Forensic Reports:a81c8048@forensics.dmarc-report.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(109 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:68.142.140.136
Name Servers:
amy.ns.cloudflare.com
lee.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: mail.protectmichild.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using traditional HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The code quality is basic but functional, with multiple alternate stylesheets for text resizing indicating some accessibility consideration. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or external dependencies detected. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and mobile responsiveness is basic. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking technologies, which aligns with privacy-focused government services. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security and user experience.
Analyze Another Website