Skip to main content

Is protektor.com a Scam? Security Check Results - protektor.de Reviews

protektor.com favicon

Is protektor.com Safe? Security Analysis for protektor.de

Check if protektor.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingGermanylarge
WordPressjQuerySelect2Swiper.jsBootstrap (custom container)+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:51:02 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Protektor.de is a well-established German manufacturing company specializing in the development and production of building profiles and modern construction solutions. The company positions itself as a market leader in Europe, serving construction professionals, craftsmen, and industry partners with a broad product portfolio and innovative services including a loyalty program and mobile app. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as jQuery, Select2, and Swiper.js, and employs best practices including HTTPS, cookie consent management, and SEO optimization. Performance and mobile responsiveness are good, supporting a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not published, representing areas for improvement. Analytics usage is moderate with Google Tag Manager, balanced with privacy compliance via cookie consent. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong business credibility and technical maturity with a security posture that is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation. No blocking or WAF challenges were detected, allowing full content analysis.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQuerySelect2Swiper.jsBootstrap (custom container)Font Awesome 4.7Google Tag Managertarteaucitron.io (cookie consent)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Protektor operates in the manufacturing sector focused on construction materials, specifically building profiles and related solutions. The company leverages a family-owned, medium-to-large enterprise model with a strong European market presence and a diversified product range. Their business model includes direct sales, partnerships with craftsmen and industry, and value-added services such as loyalty programs and digital tools. The website's multilingual support and extensive product catalog indicate a strategy targeting broad European markets. Trust signals such as certifications, awards, and a long company history reinforce market positioning. The presence of partner domains suggests a collaborative ecosystem supporting customer engagement and service delivery.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@protektor.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers implemented. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable third-party tool, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. No sensitive information leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels limits transparency and preparedness perception. The site would benefit from explicit documentation of security governance and incident handling procedures to enhance trust and compliance, especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. Overall, the security posture is good but not comprehensive.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security governance and controls.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

protektor.de

Description:

Marktführer in Europa, Familienunternehmen, innovativer Mittelständler, Partner des Handwerks, Problemlöser am Bau, Zulieferer der Industrie, verlässlicher Arbeitgeber und engagierter Ausbilder, Preisträger, regionaler Förderer und immer die beste Lösung.

Key Services:
Development and production of building profilesInnovative construction solutionsPartner services for craftsmen and industryLoyalty program and app
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQuerySelect2Swiper.jsBootstrap (custom container)Font Awesome 4.7Google Tag Managertarteaucitron.io (cookie consent)
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for AJAX calls

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
tarteaucitron.io
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 25% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:194.172.58.60 ip4:185.88.214.253 ip4:185.88.212.223 ip4:94.79.157.140 ip4:217.239.225.50 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:agenturserver.de a:dd28820.kasserver.com a:srv-a-io.c-1294.maxcluster.net a:mx01.ispgateway.de a:mx05.ispgateway .de -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine(25% enforcement)
Aggregate Reports:spam@protektor.de
Forensic Reports:spam@protektor.de

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.166.20.143
Name Servers:
soa1.ilk.net
soa2.ilk.de
soa3.ilkdns.de
MX Records:
5: protektor-de.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073000, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:194.172.58.60 ip4:185.88.214.253 ip4:185.88.212.223 ip4:94.79.157.140 ip4:217.239.225.50 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:agenturserver.de a:dd28820.kasserver.com a:srv-a-io.c-1294.maxcluster.net a:mx01.ispgateway.de a:mx05.ispgateway .de -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a well-structured theme and use of contemporary JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Select2, and Swiper.js for enhanced UI/UX. The site employs responsive design principles and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO best practices are followed with appropriate meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some scope for optimization in loading times. The use of Google Tag Manager and tarteaucitron.io indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security and performance.
Analyze Another Website