Skip to main content

Is protocolmonsterlabs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Protocol Monster Labs Reviews

protocolmonsterlabs.com favicon

Is protocolmonsterlabs.com Safe? Security Analysis for Protocol Monster Labs

Check if protocolmonsterlabs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
FramerGoogle AnalyticsWeb fonts (Rubik, Inter, Fragment Mono)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:35:11 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Protocol Monster Labs is a recently established company (founded in 2024) specializing in creating on-chain digital monster collectibles on the Bitcoin blockchain. The company targets blockchain enthusiasts and collectors interested in unique digital assets. Their market position is niche, focusing on innovative blockchain collectibles with community engagement primarily via Discord and social media platforms like X.com (Twitter). The website is professionally designed using Framer, with moderate technical maturity and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced DNS security and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the business appears legitimate and focused on a specialized technology sector.

Detected Technologies

FramerGoogle AnalyticsWeb fonts (Rubik, Inter, Fragment Mono)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology sector, specifically in blockchain-based digital collectibles. Their business model revolves around creating and promoting unique on-chain assets, leveraging community platforms for engagement. The presence of terms of service hosted on a partner domain suggests collaboration or shared services with Polychain Monsters. The company is small-sized and newly founded, with no visible subsidiaries or parent company. Their marketing relies on social media and community channels. The lack of direct contact information may limit customer trust but is somewhat mitigated by active community links.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures, representing a compliance gap. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Protocol Monster Labs

Description:

Creating digital monster collectibles on Bitcoin.

Key Services:
on-chain monster collectibles creationcommunity engagement via Discord
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerGoogle AnalyticsWeb fonts (Rubik, Inter, Fragment Mono)
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:52.223.52.2, 35.71.142.77
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1720017981, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:40ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and hosting platform, which provides a visually appealing and responsive user experience. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads a variety of web fonts and uses modulepreload for JavaScript modules, indicating a modern frontend architecture. Hosting details are not explicit but likely use Framer's infrastructure. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced structured data or rich snippets. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No forms are present, reducing data collection risks but also limiting user interaction capabilities.
Analyze Another Website