Skip to main content

Is protofund.com a Scam? Security Check Results - protofund.com Reviews

P

Is protofund.com Safe? Security Analysis for protofund.com

Check if protofund.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Next.jsReact
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:39:35 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.protofund.com currently presents minimal content, consisting solely of a fullscreen background video with no textual or navigational elements. The absence of metadata beyond a basic description and the lack of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicate an early-stage or placeholder site. The WHOIS data query returned no registration information, suggesting the domain may be unregistered or expired, which significantly impacts the site's legitimacy and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, but lacks essential security and compliance features. Overall, the site exhibits a low maturity level in both business and security aspects, with critical gaps in domain registration, contact information, and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReact

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of business content, contact details, or company information on the site, it is not possible to ascertain market positioning, business model, or target audience. The site appears to be a placeholder or under development with no visible revenue streams or partnership indicators. No certifications or trust signals are present, and the minimal content quality further limits business intelligence insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, contact information for incident response, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further reduce the security maturity. The domain's unregistered or expired status is a critical risk factor. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the lack of security best practices and compliance measures is concerning.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register or renew the domain to establish legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Protofund

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReact
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal consisting mainly of a fullscreen background video with no textual content or navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(335 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-1083.awsdns-07.org
ns-1551.awsdns-01.co.uk
ns-453.awsdns-56.com
ns-570.awsdns-07.net
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React frameworks, indicating a modern technology stack. However, the site content is minimal, lacking SEO optimization, accessibility features, and performance indicators. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. The site appears to be a static export with no dynamic content or forms. Technical debt is low due to minimal implementation but modernization opportunities include adding SEO metadata, accessibility improvements, and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website