Skip to main content

Is provia.at a Scam? Security Check Results - ÖBB Holding AG Reviews

Ö

Is provia.at Safe? Security Analysis for ÖBB Holding AG

Check if provia.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationAustriaenterprise
jQueryBootstrapTinyMCEKnockout.jsToastr+4 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:45:32 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ProVia is a secure, official electronic procurement platform jointly operated by ÖBB Holding AG and ASFINAG, two major Austrian transportation infrastructure entities. It facilitates public procurement processes, contract management, and audit systems for companies wishing to provide services to these organizations. The platform targets business users and suppliers, providing a professional and government-compliant environment. The website content is primarily in German and includes clear instructions, support contacts, and legal terms. Technically, the site uses a modern web stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Kendo UI, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and anti-forgery tokens, though some HTTP security headers are missing and no cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture appropriate for a government-related procurement portal, with high trustworthiness and legitimacy based on WHOIS data and business alignment.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapTinyMCEKnockout.jsToastrMoment.jsjqxWidgetsKendo UIGlobalize.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform serves as a critical B2B interface for public procurement in Austria's transportation sector, operated by ÖBB Holding AG and ASFINAG. Its business model centers on facilitating transparent and legally compliant tendering and contract management processes. The site’s market position is strong as the official portal for these entities, providing a competitive advantage through integration with federal procurement laws. Revenue streams likely derive from government budgets and operational contracts. The target customer segment includes suppliers and contractors in transportation infrastructure. The partnership ecosystem includes ASFINAG and ÖBB, reinforcing credibility. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining compliance with EU regulations and enhancing user experience to support supplier engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

k*****@oebb.at
i*****@asfinag.at

Phone Numbers (2)

+4351778*******
+4380040******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of anti-forgery tokens, and clear user guidance on password confidentiality. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a moderate risk. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the platform to compliance issues under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly documented, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the platform aligns with good security practices expected for government procurement portals but would benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ÖBB Holding AG

Description:

ProVia is the electronic procurement platform of ÖBB and ASFINAG used for conducting procurement procedures according to federal procurement law, contract management, and audit system recording (only ÖBB). It invites companies offering services to ÖBB and ASFINAG to register.

Key Services:
Electronic tenderingContract managementAudit system recording
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapTinyMCEKnockout.jsToastrMoment.jsjqxWidgetsKendo UIGlobalize.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No password requested by staff
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of anti-forgery tokens in forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional procurement portal for Austrian transportation entities ÖBB and ASFINAG.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000; includeSubDomains;"

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, sameorigin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:195.69.192.0/22 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:195.69.192.173
Name Servers:
dns1.oebb.atDNS only
dns2.oebb.atDNS only
MX Records:
15: mail01.oebb.at
15: mail02.oebb.at
15: mail03.oebb.at
15: mail04.oebb.at
SOA:Serial: 2023092600, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:195.69.192.0/22 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a robust technology stack featuring jQuery, Bootstrap, TinyMCE, Knockout.js, Toastr, Moment.js, jqxWidgets, and Kendo UI, indicating a mature and modular front-end architecture. The backend is likely ASP.NET MVC based on URL patterns and anti-forgery tokens. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta description content. The site uses no detected CMS and hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of cookie consent, which could impact compliance and security posture. Opportunities exist to modernize accessibility and SEO features and enhance performance monitoring.
Analyze Another Website