Skip to main content

Is proxyshare.com a Scam? Security Check Results - proxyshare.com Reviews

proxyshare.com favicon

Is proxyshare.com Safe? Security Analysis for ProxyShare:75M+ Residential Proxies & Socks5 Poxies Provider

Check if proxyshare.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google Identity ServicesVue.js (implied by _nuxt assets)Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt assets)Montserrat fontRubik font+1 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:43:40 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ProxyShare is a technology company providing residential proxy services with a large network of over 75 million IPs across 195+ countries. Their offerings include rotating, unlimited, and static residential proxies aimed at public data collection and other business needs. The website is built using modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and age. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or policies. Privacy and compliance documentation are missing, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the site appears functional and professional but lacks critical trust and compliance elements.

Detected Technologies

Google Identity ServicesVue.js (implied by _nuxt assets)Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt assets)Montserrat fontRubik fontLexend font

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ProxyShare operates in the proxy service market, targeting businesses and developers requiring residential IP proxies for data collection and related activities. The business model revolves around providing proxy access via various protocols and payment methods including local payments, cryptocurrencies, and others. The company positions itself as a provider of a large-scale proxy network but lacks visible certifications or trust signals on the site. The absence of contact information and privacy policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of ProxyShare's website is limited based on the available data. While HTTPS is likely enabled, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No forms with sensitive data collection were identified, reducing immediate risk, but the overall security posture would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

ProxyShare 75M+ Residential IPs 195+ countries, providing the best Rotating Residential Proxies, Unlimited Residential Proxies, and Static Residential Proxies. Perfect for Public Data Collection.

Key Services:
Rotating Residential ProxiesUnlimited Residential ProxiesStatic Residential Proxies
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Identity ServicesVue.js (implied by _nuxt assets)Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt assets)Montserrat fontRubik fontLexend font
Frameworks:
Nuxt.jsVue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable or domain unregistered

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mxsspf.sendpulse.com include:spf.mxhichina.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:abuse@proxyshare.com
Forensic Reports:abuse@proxyshare.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(747 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.69.220, 172.67.213.130
Name Servers:
dorthy.ns.cloudflare.com
jay.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: mxn.mxhichina.com
10: mxw.mxhichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2376949534, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:110ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mxsspf.sendpulse.com include:spf.mxhichina.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages modern frontend frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with asynchronous loading of Google Identity Services for authentication. Fonts used include Montserrat, Rubik, and Lexend, contributing to a professional design. Performance appears moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured FAQ schema in JSON-LD format. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory areas.
Analyze Another Website