Skip to main content

Is psdfan.com a Scam? Security Check Results - FANEXTRA.com Reviews

psdfan.com favicon

Is psdfan.com Safe? Security Analysis for FANEXTRA.com

Check if psdfan.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/asmall
WordPress 3.0.3jQuery 1.4.2Google AnalyticsVisual Website OptimizerBuySellAds
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:26:48 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

PSDFAN is a niche media website focused on providing Adobe Photoshop tutorials, design articles, and free resources to graphic designers and digital artists. The site operates as a content publishing platform with a community-oriented approach, offering educational materials and downloadable assets. It maintains partnerships with related design marketplaces such as Design Cuts and FanExtra, enhancing its value proposition to its target audience. Technically, the website is built on an older WordPress version with legacy JavaScript libraries, indicating a need for modernization to improve security and performance. The site uses common analytics and advertising tools but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate but weakened by outdated software and missing security headers. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content appears professional and relevant. Overall, the site serves its niche well but requires technical and compliance improvements to enhance trust and security.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 3.0.3jQuery 1.4.2Google AnalyticsVisual Website OptimizerBuySellAds

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets Photoshop users and designers seeking tutorials and resources, positioning itself as a specialized educational media outlet. Its business model revolves around content monetization through advertising and partnerships with design marketplaces. The presence of affiliate and advertising networks suggests revenue streams from ads and referrals. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes Design Cuts and FanExtra, indicating a collaborative approach within the design community. Growth indicators include a large archive of tutorials and active community content. However, the lack of transparent business contact information and missing WHOIS data may hinder credibility with new users and partners.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate but with notable gaps. The site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and runs outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, exposing it to known vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and security policy information are absent, suggesting limited formal security governance. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the site would benefit from a security audit, software updates, and implementation of privacy and security best practices to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update WordPress and all JavaScript libraries to the latest stable versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FANEXTRA.com

Description:

Photoshop tutorials, design articles, freebies, inspiration, resources and more!

Key Services:
Photoshop tutorialsDesign articlesFreebies and resourcesCommunity content
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 3.0.3jQuery 1.4.2Google AnalyticsVisual Website OptimizerBuySellAds
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsVisual Website Optimizer
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
BuySellAds
Tracking Pixels:
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing Tools:
AWeber
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:78.110.173.82 ip4:94.229.72.243 +a +mx +ip4:212.71.252.171 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

22 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(186 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:78.110.173.82
Name Servers:
ns1.thiswebhost.com
ns2.thiswebhost.com
ns3.thiswebhost.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: fanextra.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090202, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:78.110.173.82 ip4:94.229.72.243 +a +mx +ip4:212.71.252.171 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 3.0.3, an outdated CMS version, with jQuery 1.4.2, which is also outdated and vulnerable. It uses common third-party services including Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, and BuySellAds for analytics and advertising. The site loads multiple CSS and JavaScript files, some asynchronously, indicating moderate performance optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no explicit responsive design frameworks detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The technical debt from outdated software poses risks to stability and security, and modernization is recommended.
Analyze Another Website