Skip to main content

Is psgbi.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland Reviews

psgbi.org favicon

Is psgbi.org Safe? Security Analysis for Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Check if psgbi.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareUnited Kingdomsmall
Bootstrap 3jQueryGoogle AnalyticsTypekit FontsModernizr
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:06:48 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland is a well-established non-profit professional society dedicated to advancing the understanding and management of pancreatic diseases. Founded in 1975, it serves healthcare professionals and patients primarily in the UK and Ireland. The society organizes annual scientific meetings, supports research, and provides patient information, maintaining strong links with related national and international organizations. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the website employs a moderate technology stack including Bootstrap 3, jQuery, and Google Analytics, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. While the site is functional and well-structured, there is room for improvement in SEO and performance optimization. Security-wise, HTTPS is implied, and cookie consent is implemented, but there is a lack of explicit security headers and published security policies, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. The WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting the ability to fully verify domain registration details and reducing domain trust slightly. However, the presence of a registered charity number and professional content supports legitimacy. Overall, the website scores well in content quality and business credibility but should address security and transparency gaps to strengthen its posture. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, improving WHOIS data availability, and enhancing SEO and accessibility to better serve users and stakeholders.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 3jQueryGoogle AnalyticsTypekit FontsModernizr

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The society occupies a niche position in the healthcare non-profit sector, focusing on pancreatic diseases. Its competitive advantage lies in its long history, professional network, and association with reputable journals and organizations. The business model is based on membership, events, and knowledge dissemination rather than commercial revenue. Target customers include medical professionals, researchers, and patients. Growth indicators include upcoming annual meetings and active research publication links. The partnership ecosystem includes collaborations with UK and international pancreatic and gastroenterology societies. Operationally, the society maintains a focused digital presence with moderate technical sophistication and a clear mission. Strategically, the society could expand digital engagement and transparency to enhance member value and public trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism, indicating basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of third-party libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap requires regular updates to mitigate risks. Overall, the security maturity is basic to moderate, suitable for a non-commercial informational site but improvable to meet higher standards. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Description:

An alliance of professionals advancing the understanding and management of pancreatic conditions, for the benefit of patients. The Society promotes study and research into diseases of the pancreas and supports professional discussions and knowledge dissemination in the UK and Ireland.

Key Services:
Annual Scientific MeetingsResearch supportPatient information disseminationProfessional networkingAccess to Pancreatology journal for members
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 3jQueryGoogle AnalyticsTypekit FontsModernizr
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(709 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:178.62.79.201
Name Servers:
lina.ns.cloudflare.com
will.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: mx.zoho.com
1: mx2.zoho.com
SOA:Serial: 2381690798, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with Bootstrap 3 and jQuery, which are stable but somewhat dated technologies. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with some potential for improvement in loading speed and SEO metadata completeness. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The site uses standard HTML5 and includes polyfills for older browsers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website