Is pub.network Safe? Security Analysis for pub.network
Check if pub.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website at pub.network is currently inaccessible due to an access denied error, likely caused by a web application firewall or other security mechanism. No meaningful content, metadata, or business information is available for analysis. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to unsupported TLD and access restrictions, preventing extraction of registrar, creation, expiry, or registrant details. This lack of transparency and content severely limits the ability to assess the business, technical infrastructure, or security posture. From a technical perspective, the site lacks detectable technologies, scripts, or frameworks, and no security headers or HTTPS information is present. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicates poor compliance with data protection standards. No contact or incident response information is available, further reducing trustworthiness. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, and the site is effectively blocked from analysis by the access denied message. The domain's legitimacy is questionable given the lack of WHOIS data and website content. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with valid SSL certificates, adding standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, providing clear contact and incident response information, and improving website content and technical implementation to enhance trust and compliance.
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Due to the absence of accessible website content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be either newly registered or protected by privacy mechanisms, with no public registrant information. No business model, market positioning, or service offerings are identifiable. The lack of contact details and policies suggests the site is either under development, restricted, or not actively maintained. No partnerships or related domains are evident.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of pub.network is currently poor. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security best practices. The access denied error suggests a security mechanism is in place, but it also blocks legitimate analysis. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or certifications are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to lack of transparency and security controls.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Generic Detected
Access denied message in HTML indicates content is blocked or restricted, likely by a WAF or security mechanism.
Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Business Insights
poor
inconsistent
Technical Stack
slow
poor
poor
poor
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website content is inaccessible due to access denied error
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 36 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings