Skip to main content

Is public-office.info a Scam? Security Check Results - Public Office Reviews

P

Is public-office.info Safe? Security Analysis for Public Office

Check if public-office.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherAustraliasmall
HTML5CSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 3:33:24 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Public Office is a small, Australia-based collaborative research and design practice specializing in graphic design and digital publishing. Their work focuses on the intersection of physical and digital publishing, including custom tools for content creation and peer-to-peer autonomous publishing experiments. The website presents basic content describing their services and contact information but lacks formal privacy, cookie, or security policies. Technically, the website is hosted on DigitalOcean with a simple HTML and CSS stack. The site is accessible and moderately optimized but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility features, and security headers. No CMS or analytics tools are detected, indicating a minimalistic technical footprint. From a security perspective, the domain is registered transparently with no privacy protection, which aligns with the business type. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and formal policies indicates room for improvement in security posture and compliance. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy for its niche audience but would benefit from enhanced security measures, privacy compliance, and richer content to improve professionalism and user trust.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Public Office operates in a niche creative sector focusing on graphic design and digital publishing innovation. Their business model revolves around collaborative research and development of publishing tools and methods, targeting creative professionals and publishers interested in experimental and autonomous publishing. The company appears to maintain a lean operation with no subsidiaries or parent companies. Their market position is specialized and likely local to Melbourne, Australia. The lack of certifications or trust signals suggests a small-scale operation without extensive formal partnerships or compliance frameworks.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@public-office.info

Phone Numbers (1)

+6104330*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied by hosting provider but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. The WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, reducing suspicion. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small creative business but insufficient for handling sensitive data or regulated environments.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Public Office

Description:

Public Office is a collaborative research, design & development practise focusing on the intersection of physical and digital publishing. Their digital projects focus on exports to printed matter, custom tools and software for content creation and dispersion; and experiments in autonomous publishing in the peer-to-peer space.

Key Services:
graphic designdigital publishing developmentcustom content creation toolsautonomous publishing experiments
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • HTTPS implied by domain hosting provider

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small creative practice focused on graphic design and digital publishing.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com ?all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(348 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:45.32.191.147
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.com
ns2.digitalocean.com
ns3.digitalocean.com
MX Records:
10: in1-smtp.messagingengine.com
20: in2-smtp.messagingengine.com
SOA:Serial: 1664419168, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple HTML and CSS stack without detectable frameworks or CMS. Hosting is provided by DigitalOcean, a reputable cloud provider. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The lack of modern frameworks or CMS suggests low technical complexity but also potential technical debt if scaling is required. Security configurations are minimal, with no DNSSEC and no security headers detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small creative practice but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website