Skip to main content

Is pulsnetz.org a Scam? Security Check Results - See PrivacyGuardian.org Reviews

S

Is pulsnetz.org Safe? Security Analysis for See PrivacyGuardian.org

Check if pulsnetz.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
Google Adsense Domains CAFGoogle Ad ServicesJavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:21:12 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website pulsnetz.org is a newly registered domain (Nov 2023) currently serving as a parked domain landing page. It does not provide any business-related content, services, or contact information. The site primarily hosts advertising scripts from Google Adsense and Youseasky, indicating a business model based on domain parking and ad revenue rather than active commercial operations. The technical infrastructure relies on common advertising and tracking technologies but lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a basic privacy policy accessible via a popup link and no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site exhibits low digital maturity and limited business credibility.

Detected Technologies

Google Adsense Domains CAFGoogle Ad ServicesJavaScriptHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the absence of business content and the use of privacy-protected WHOIS data, pulsnetz.org appears to be a domain held for parking or resale rather than active business use. There is no evidence of a defined market position, target audience beyond general internet users, or key services. The registrant is masked by a privacy service, and the domain uses parking name servers, consistent with domain monetization strategies. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The lack of contact details and business information limits trust and credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no indication of HTTPS usage or security headers, which exposes users to potential risks. The site uses multiple third-party advertising and tracking scripts, increasing the attack surface and privacy risks. No incident response or security policies are published. The absence of cookie consent and GDPR compliance indicators further highlights compliance gaps. While no active vulnerabilities or malware were detected, the overall security hygiene is poor and requires significant improvement to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

See PrivacyGuardian.org

Description:

No business description or services are provided on the website. The site is a parked domain landing page with advertising content.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Adsense Domains CAFGoogle Ad ServicesJavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseGoogle Ad ServicesYouseasky
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense CAFYouseasky tracking
Marketing Tools:
Google AdsenseYouseasky
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain landing page with advertising scripts and no original content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

72/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd1b:212c:a5f9::/48 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(80 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:185.53.178.50
Name Servers:
ns1.parkingcrew.net
ns2.parkingcrew.net
MX Records:
5: mail.h-email.net
SOA:Serial: 1757053000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd1b:212c:a5f9::/48 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with heavy reliance on third-party advertising and tracking services including Google Adsense and Youseasky. The domain is hosted on parking name servers provided by NameSilo and ParkingCrew, indicating no dedicated hosting infrastructure. Performance is moderate but limited by ad scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced SEO or structured data present. The site lacks a CMS or modern web frameworks, reflecting its parked domain status. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS and security headers, and extensive third-party tracking without user consent.
Analyze Another Website