Skip to main content

Is punkaustria.at a Scam? Security Check Results - punkaustria.at Reviews

P

Is punkaustria.at Safe? Security Analysis for GIBLING - tausche und zahle mit KUNST

Check if punkaustria.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherAustriasmall
HTMLCSS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:11:21 AM
37
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website punkaustria.at represents a niche cultural and artistic project centered around 'GIBLING', an art discount currency initiative promoting art exchange and community participation in Austria. The site provides information about editions, partners, participation, and art collections but lacks commercial business elements. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on simple HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS. There is no evidence of advanced analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies. Security posture is minimal with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating limited compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations. Contact information is minimal, with no explicit emails or phone numbers found, only a link to a contact/impressum page. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and serves a cultural community purpose rather than commercial or transactional functions.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The project targets artists, art collectors, and cultural participants interested in alternative art currency and community art projects. It operates as a small-scale, local initiative without evident revenue streams or commercial partnerships beyond cultural organizations. The domain registration aligns with a local Austrian hosting provider, supporting legitimacy. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or formal contact details suggests a grassroots or volunteer-driven model. The external links to related cultural organizations indicate a partnership ecosystem focused on art and culture rather than commercial markets.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low with no HTTPS confirmation, no security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No forms or scripts collecting sensitive data were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, and formal privacy documentation to improve trust and compliance. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting the ability to respond to security events effectively.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website promotes 'GIBLING', an art discount currency or project related to art exchange and payment using art. It references editions, partners accepting Gibling, participation instructions, and a collection of art. It appears to be a cultural or artistic initiative rather than a commercial business.

Key Services:
Art discount currency (Gibling)Art collection and exhibitionsCommunity participation in art projects
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small cultural/art project focused on an art currency called Gibling.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:193.170.194.20 ip6:2001:628:2040::20 ip4:193.170.194.6 ip6:2001:628:2040::6 ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Forensic Reports:postmaster@servus.at

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:193.170.194.42
Name Servers:
crom.servus.atWHOIS only
dns0.servus.atDNS only
dns1.servus.atDNS only
www.servus.atWHOIS only
MX Records:
10: smtp1.servus.at
100: mail.servus.at
SOA:Serial: 2024010100, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:193.170.194.20 ip6:2001:628:2040::20 ip4:193.170.194.6 ip6:2001:628:2040::6 ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS, indicating low technical complexity. The site is moderately optimized for mobile with viewport meta tags but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal data collection. Hosting is provided by a local Austrian registrar, consistent with the website's regional focus. Performance is likely moderate given the simple content and lack of heavy scripts. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security posture.
Analyze Another Website