Skip to main content

Is puntoeffe.it a Scam? Security Check Results - Edra S.p.a Reviews

puntoeffe.it favicon

Is puntoeffe.it Safe? Security Analysis for Edra S.p.a

Check if puntoeffe.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareItalymedium
JavaScript ES ModulesUsercentrics CMPGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)DoubleClick for Publishers (GPT)+2 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:11:46 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Punto Effe is a well-established Italian biweekly magazine targeting pharmacy owners and pharmacists, providing comprehensive content on pharmacy services, healthcare, legislation, and market trends. The website reflects a mature digital presence with subscription options for both digital and print editions, supported by mobile apps on Android and iOS. The company behind the site is Edra S.p.a, a reputable entity in the healthcare media sector in Italy. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript modules, integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for privacy compliance, and employs Google Ad Manager for advertising. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, CSRF protection on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript ES ModulesUsercentrics CMPGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)DoubleClick for Publishers (GPT)jQuery 3.7.1OnScreen.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the healthcare media sector, focusing on pharmacy professionals in Italy. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence (26 years), authoritative content, and multi-channel distribution (print, digital, apps). Revenue streams include subscriptions, advertising, and partnerships with related healthcare and pharmaceutical organizations. The target customers are pharmacy owners and healthcare professionals seeking updated industry insights. The partnership ecosystem includes Edra S.p.a and several specialized healthcare portals. The company demonstrates strategic digital maturity with integrated analytics and consent management, positioning it well for continued growth in its niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

028*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF tokens on forms, and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Usercentrics. Use of Google Tag Manager and DoubleClick is properly integrated, minimizing exposure to common vulnerabilities. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure channels indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and incident contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Edra S.p.a

Description:

Periodico per il Farmacista e le Farmacie in Italia: attualità, professione, mercato, ricerca, farmacologia, farmacovigilanza, marketing, diritto, leggi, fisco e tributi.

Key Services:
Biweekly magazine publicationDigital app accessPrint magazine deliveryInterviews and professional insightsNewsletter subscription
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript ES ModulesUsercentrics CMPGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)DoubleClick for Publishers (GPT)jQuery 3.7.1OnScreen.js
Frameworks:
Usercentrics for consent management
Platforms:
WebAndroid app (Google Play)iOS app (App Store)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token used in forms
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for privacy compliance

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ad Manager (DoubleClick for Publishers)
Marketing Tools:
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well maintained.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dpsw.it -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(166 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:194.79.56.177
Name Servers:
dns.widhost.netDNS only
dns2.widhost.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.dpsw.it
SOA:Serial: 2024030401, TTL: 38400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:151ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dpsw.it -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript ES modules, Google Tag Manager, and Usercentrics for consent management. It supports mobile platforms via dedicated Android and iOS apps. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The CMS or backend platform is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site employs asynchronous script loading and lazy loading for images, enhancing user experience. Technical risks are minimal but depend on third-party script security and ongoing maintenance.
Analyze Another Website