Skip to main content

Is purefindresults.com a Scam? Security Check Results - purefindresults.com Reviews

P

Is purefindresults.com Safe? Security Analysis for purefindresults.com

Check if purefindresults.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQuery 1.11.3ConsentManager.net CMPAkamai CDNJavaScript ES5/ES6
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:34:25 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

purefindresults.com is a web search portal offering users a search interface with autocomplete suggestions and search result redirection. The site appears to be a small-scale technology service focused on providing search capabilities. The business model is centered around web search services, targeting a general audience. The website is basic in design and functionality, with moderate branding consistency and limited trust indicators such as a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates third-party consent management and tracking scripts. Hosting and DNS are managed via PublicDomainRegistry.com and ztomy.com nameservers, with no DNSSEC enabled.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.3ConsentManager.net CMPAkamai CDNJavaScript ES5/ES6

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company behind purefindresults.com is not clearly identified on the website, and no detailed business information or certifications are provided. The privacy policy is hosted on a different domain (skenzo.com), which may indicate a relationship or outsourcing of privacy management. The site lacks terms of service and direct contact emails or phone numbers, relying solely on a contact form. The market position and competitive advantages are unclear due to limited information. The business appears to be in an early stage or minimal operation, with a focus on basic search services and user tracking for analytics and advertising purposes.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers, and use of an outdated jQuery version present potential vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications are found. The WHOIS data shows a suspicious future creation date and lacks registrant details, reducing trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing modern security headers, updating libraries, enabling DNSSEC, and providing clearer security and incident response information.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A web search portal providing a search interface with autocomplete suggestions and search results redirection.

Key Services:
Web searchAutocomplete suggestions
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.3ConsentManager.net CMPAkamai CDNJavaScript ES5/ES6
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Clarity (Microsoft Clarity)Custom event tracking via kafkaLogPixelLib
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
kafkaLogPixelLibclarityEventTrkr
Marketing Tools:
ConsentManager.netAkamai CDN
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a basic web search portal with autocomplete functionality.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

70/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:purefindresults.com
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:11/10/2025 (37 days)
SANs:purefindresults.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: ~

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:204.11.56.67
Name Servers:
ns1667.ztomy.comDNS only
ns2667.ztomy.comDNS only
MX Records:
300: ~
SOA:Serial: 2011062801, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:485ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic web technologies including jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates third-party consent management and tracking scripts from ConsentManager.net and Microsoft Clarity. Hosting is via PublicDomainRegistry.com with DNS managed by ztomy.com nameservers. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or minimalistic build. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features but includes basic meta tags and responsive design elements. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and missing security enhancements, presenting opportunities for modernization and improved resilience.
Analyze Another Website