Skip to main content

Is purpurs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA “Purpurs Design” Reviews

purpurs.com favicon

Is purpurs.com Safe? Security Analysis for SIA “Purpurs Design”

Check if purpurs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommercejQueryBootstrapGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 10:40:08 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Purpurs.com is an e-commerce website operated by SIA “Purpurs Design,” specializing in design stationery products targeted primarily at the Latvian market. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on retailing niche design paper goods. The business model is typical for small-scale online retail, leveraging WooCommerce on a WordPress platform. The site is well-structured with good navigation and mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommercejQueryBootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company appears to be a small retail entity focused on design stationery, serving a general audience in Latvia. The use of multilingual support (Latvian and English) indicates an intent to reach broader markets. The business leverages modern e-commerce technologies and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, suggesting an active digital marketing strategy. However, the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages may limit compliance and trust for some customers.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

P*****@PURPURS.COM

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716720****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, indicating a baseline security and privacy posture. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of visible security policies or incident response contacts suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which impacts overall trustworthiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA “Purpurs Design”

Description:

Dizaina papīrlietas

Key Services:
design stationery products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommercejQueryBootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot
Frameworks:
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:smtp.deac.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:purpurs.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/13/2025 (73 days)
SANs:purpurs.com, *.purpurs.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1925 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.16.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.32.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.48.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001
Name Servers:
coco.ns.cloudflare.com
doug.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mx-01.deac.lv
20: mx2.deac.lv
30: mx3.deac.lv
SOA:Serial: 2378095939, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:smtp.deac.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, using common libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie management. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets efficiently and is mobile optimized. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing asset delivery and caching. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data.
Analyze Another Website