Skip to main content

Is pusher.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Pusher Reviews

pusher.com favicon

Is pusher.com Safe? Security Analysis for Pusher

Check if pusher.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
GatsbyReactSegment analyticsHubSpotGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:23:14 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Pusher is a well-established technology company specializing in realtime APIs and push notification services, serving developers and enterprises globally. The company operates under the parent company MessageBird, leveraging a mature domain and strong market presence. Their website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, rich content, and clear positioning as a leader in realtime technologies. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like React and Gatsby, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protections, though improvements such as DNSSEC and explicit security policies could enhance trust. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap. Overall, the website is trustworthy, technically sound, and business credible, with room for enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

GatsbyReactSegment analyticsHubSpotGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Pusher's market positioning as a leader in realtime APIs is supported by its long domain history and reputable parent company MessageBird. The SaaS business model targets developers and enterprises needing scalable realtime communication features. Key revenue streams likely include subscription plans for their Channels and Beams products. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem and notable clients, enhancing its competitive advantage. Growth indicators include comprehensive developer resources and active marketing integrations. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy and security disclosures to meet evolving compliance demands.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of Pusher's website is good, with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections preventing unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance gaps include missing GDPR-related disclosures and absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact channels for security issues. The security culture appears developer-focused but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Pusher

Description:

Simple, scalable and reliable. Hosted realtime APIs loved by developers and trusted by giants. Build live dashboards, notifications, geotracking, chat and more.

Key Services:
Realtime APIs (Channels)Push notifications (Beams)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
GatsbyReactSegment analyticsHubSpotGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS
Frameworks:
ReactGatsby
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Domain status includes client and server prohibitions to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
HubSpot AnalyticsSegment AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
HubSpotSegmentFacebook Ads Pixel
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotSegment
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mail.zendesk.com ip4:23.249.208.0/20 ip4:23.251.224.0/19 ip4:24.110.64.0/18 ip4:54.240.0.0/18 ip4:54.240.64.0/18 ip4:69.169.224.0/20 ip4:76.223.128.0/19 ip4:76.223.176.0/20 ip4:199.127.232.0/22 ip4:199.255.192.0/22 ip4:206.55.144.0/20 ip4 :216.221.160.0/19 ip4:50.31.156.96/27 ip4:50.31.205.0/24 ip4:104.245.209.192/26 ip4:147.160.158.0/24 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:108.177.96.0/20 include:_netblocks1.pusher.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:59sij-9549@rua.dmarc.emailanalyst.com
Forensic Reports:59sij-9549@ruf.dmarc.emailanalyst.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2460 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.235.245.94
Name Servers:
ns-1482.awsdns-57.org
ns-1878.awsdns-42.co.uk
ns-703.awsdns-23.net
ns-74.awsdns-09.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
3: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
3: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:104ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mail.zendesk.com ip4:23.249.208.0/20 ip4:23.251.224.0/19 ip4:24.110.64.0/18 ip4:54.240.0.0/18 ip4:54.240.64.0/18 ip4:69.169.224.0/20 ip4:76.223.128.0/19 ip4:76.223.176.0/20 ip4:199.127.232.0/22 ip4:199.255.192.0/22 ip4:206.55.144.0/20 ip4 :216.221.160.0/19 ip4:50.31.156.96/27 ip4:50.31.205.0/24 ip4:104.245.209.192/26 ip4:147.160.158.0/24 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:108.177.96.0/20 include:_netblocks1.pusher.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure with CDN support. The integration of analytics and marketing tools like HubSpot, Segment, and Google Tag Manager indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. Technical debt is minimal based on the clean code examples and structured content. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and reliable user experience aligned with the company's realtime technology focus.
Analyze Another Website