Skip to main content

Is pushsecurity.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Push Security Reviews

pushsecurity.com favicon

Is pushsecurity.com Safe? Security Analysis for Push Security

Check if pushsecurity.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Tailwind CSSGraphQLAWS DNSReact (implied by JSX-like classes and structure)CDN usage
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:18:07 AM
75
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Push Security is a technology company specializing in browser threat detection and response solutions aimed at protecting enterprises from client-side and browser-based cyber threats. The company appears to be a niche player in the cybersecurity market, founded in 2019, with a focus on delivering advanced security analytics and response capabilities. The website reflects a professional and modern design, leveraging technologies such as Tailwind CSS and AWS infrastructure, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks critical compliance and security disclosures such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts, which are essential for trust and regulatory compliance. The security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, but improvements like enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Overall, the risk is moderate with strategic recommendations to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Tailwind CSSGraphQLAWS DNSReact (implied by JSX-like classes and structure)CDN usage

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the cybersecurity technology sector, targeting enterprise customers concerned with browser security threats. Its business model is B2B software-as-a-service, focusing on threat detection and response. The market positioning is specialized, with potential competitive advantages in browser-specific security. The absence of detailed business contact information and certifications on the website limits external validation of credibility. The company likely generates revenue through software subscriptions or licensing. Growth indicators and partnerships are not explicitly visible on the site. Strategic observations suggest the company should improve transparency and compliance disclosures to strengthen market trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Push Security demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represent gaps in defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting external security collaboration. The website does not provide incident response contact channels, which is a compliance and operational risk. Data protection practices and GDPR compliance indicators are missing, which could expose the company to regulatory scrutiny. Overall, the security culture appears nascent and would benefit from formalized policies and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Push Security

Description:

Push Security provides browser threat detection and response solutions to protect organizations from client-side attacks and browser-based threats.

Key Services:
Browser threat detectionBrowser threat responseSecurity analytics
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Tailwind CSSGraphQLAWS DNSReact (implied by JSX-like classes and structure)CDN usage
Frameworks:
Tailwind CSS
Platforms:
AWS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

39/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.pushsecurity.com include:amazonses.com include:6692773.spf07.hubspotemail.net ip4:54.240.88.8 ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1408-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:pushsecurity-d@dmarc.report-uri.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@pushsecurity.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(218 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:18.165.122.90, 18.165.122.63, 18.165.122.31, 18.165.122.37
Name Servers:
ns-1016.awsdns-63.net
ns-1178.awsdns-19.org
ns-1881.awsdns-43.co.uk
ns-240.awsdns-30.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.pushsecurity.com include:amazonses.com include:6692773.spf07.hubspotemail.net ip4:54.240.88.8 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Tailwind CSS for styling and likely React or similar frameworks for UI components. Hosting and DNS are managed via AWS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with CDN usage for static assets. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design principles. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website