Skip to main content

Is puzzlegarage.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Casual Games Collection Reviews

puzzlegarage.com favicon

Is puzzlegarage.com Safe? Security Analysis for Casual Games Collection

Check if puzzlegarage.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQueryBootstrapGoogle AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseAmazon Ads+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 6:54:22 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Puzzle Garage is an online platform specializing in free jigsaw puzzles with a large catalog and multiplayer options. It operates under the Casual Games Collection brand, offering premium subscriptions for exclusive content and ad removal. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and multilingual, targeting a general audience interested in casual puzzle games. Technically, it uses a modern web stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates multiple ad and analytics services. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some best practices but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism present, though extensive third-party tracking is used. Overall, the site is legitimate, consistent with its WHOIS data, and presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security transparency and contact information.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapGoogle AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseAmazon AdsPrebid.jsInMobi CMPFusePlatformID5 Sync

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the casual online gaming niche, focusing on jigsaw puzzles. It leverages a freemium model with ads and premium subscriptions. The company appears small but established since 2019, with a clear parent brand (Casual Games Collection) and a network of related casual game sites. The target market is broad, including adults and children. The site’s multilingual support and social media presence indicate efforts to reach a global audience. Revenue likely comes from advertising and subscriptions. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple casual game domains under the same parent brand, enhancing cross-promotion opportunities.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site enforces HTTPS and uses a consent management platform for cookie compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better header policies, transparency, and reduced third-party dependencies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Casual Games Collection

Description:

Puzzle Garage is an online platform offering thousands of free jigsaw puzzles playable on computers, tablets, and smartphones. It includes multiplayer puzzles and a premium subscription option to access exclusive puzzles and remove ads.

Key Services:
Online jigsaw puzzlesMultiplayer puzzle gamesPremium subscription for exclusive puzzles and ad removal
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapGoogle AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseAmazon AdsPrebid.jsInMobi CMPFusePlatformID5 Sync
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management platform for cookies

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseAmazon AdsInMobi
Tracking Pixels:
ID5 SyncConfiant Integrations
Marketing Tools:
InMobi CMP
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website offers a large catalog of free online jigsaw puzzles with premium subscription options.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.final-level.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1462 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:168.119.4.182
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
20: mx1.final-level.com
10: mx2.final-level.com
SOA:Serial: 46, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:25ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.final-level.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of jQuery and Bootstrap for UI, with multiple asynchronous scripts for ads, analytics, and consent management. Hosting is likely on a cloud platform with Google Cloud DNS. The site is mobile-optimized and supports many languages, indicating good internationalization. Performance is moderate due to multiple third-party scripts. The HTML is valid and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no CMS explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include potential performance impact and security risks from third-party scripts. Modernization opportunities include adopting newer frontend frameworks and improving security headers.
Analyze Another Website