Skip to main content

Is pwn.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - pwn.fi Reviews

pwn.fi favicon

Is pwn.fi Safe? Security Analysis for pwn.fi

Check if pwn.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherFinlandsmall
JavaScriptReactNext.js
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:22:19 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website pwn.fi presents a minimal online presence with a simple welcome message and no additional business or contact information. The site is built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure, but lacks substantive content or features. There are no visible privacy, cookie, or security policies, and no contact details or forms are provided, limiting user engagement and trust. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers and policies, and no analytics or advertising scripts are detected, suggesting minimal tracking or marketing efforts. Overall, the site appears to be a placeholder or early-stage project rather than a fully developed business platform. From a business intelligence perspective, the lack of detailed information, contact data, or service descriptions makes it difficult to ascertain the company's market position, business model, or target audience. The domain is registered in Finland with consistent WHOIS data, supporting legitimacy, but the site itself does not provide sufficient data to evaluate business credibility or operational scale. Security evaluation reveals no critical vulnerabilities but also no evidence of proactive security measures such as security headers or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is absent, with no GDPR-related policies or cookie consent mechanisms. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but the minimal content and lack of policies represent compliance and trust gaps. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding clear contact information, enhancing security headers and SSL configuration, and developing substantive content to improve user trust and business credibility. These steps will help transition the site from a minimal placeholder to a professional and secure business platform.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptReactNext.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website pwn.fi currently functions as a minimal digital presence with no explicit business information or service offerings. The domain is registered in Finland, suggesting a local or regional focus. The absence of contact details, privacy policies, or terms of service limits transparency and user trust. There is no indication of partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications. The business model and revenue streams cannot be determined from the site content. The use of modern web frameworks indicates technical capability but the lack of content suggests early-stage or placeholder status. No marketing or analytics tools are in use, indicating limited digital marketing efforts. Overall, the site does not provide sufficient data to assess competitive advantages or growth potential.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of pwn.fi is minimal. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from modern Next.js deployment but not explicitly confirmed in data), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security are detected. There are no visible forms or input fields, reducing attack surface, but also no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The absence of analytics or third-party scripts reduces tracking risks but also limits security monitoring capabilities. Overall, the site shows low security maturity and would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptReactNext.js
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal, consisting of a single welcome message with no additional information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:pwn.fi
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/8/2025 (32 days)
SANs:pwn.fi, *.pwn.fi

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.39.118, 172.67.145.65
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3120::1, 2a06:98c1:3121::1
Name Servers:
bob.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sara.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
666: tar.junkemailfilter.com
SOA:Serial: 2382265399, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js framework with React and JavaScript, indicating a modern and scalable technical stack. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and CSS files, suggesting a modular build. Mobile optimization appears good based on viewport meta tag and responsive CSS classes. However, the content is minimal, limiting SEO and user engagement. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate given the small content size and modern framework usage. Accessibility is basic with minimal content and no ARIA landmarks or enhanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is basic with only a title tag and viewport meta tag present. No analytics or marketing technologies are integrated. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but underutilized due to minimal content and features.
Analyze Another Website