Skip to main content

Is python.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Python Software Foundation Reviews

python.org favicon

Is python.org Safe? Security Analysis for Python Software Foundation

https://python.org

Check if python.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
jQuery 1.8.2jQuery UI 1.12.1ModernizrGoogle AnalyticsEthicalAds
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:45:12 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Python.org is the official website of the Python Software Foundation, serving as the primary hub for the Python programming language community. It offers comprehensive resources including downloads, documentation, community engagement, job listings, and news updates. The site is professionally designed with excellent content quality and clear navigation, targeting programmers and developers globally. The business model is non-profit, focusing on language promotion and community support, positioning itself as a leading entity in the technology sector.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.8.2jQuery UI 1.12.1ModernizrGoogle AnalyticsEthicalAds

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Python Software Foundation operates as a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing the Python language. Its market position is strong, supported by a large and active community. The website supports multiple services such as documentation, events, and a job board, indicating diversified engagement channels. Partnerships and integrations with various technology projects and platforms are evident through external links. The foundation's operations reflect a mature and well-established ecosystem with consistent branding and trust signals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security practices, though explicit security headers like CSP and HSTS are not detected. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and security.txt file suggests room for improvement in privacy and vulnerability disclosure practices. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Python Software Foundation

Description:

The official home of the Python Programming Language

Key Services:
Python language promotionCommunity supportDocumentationJob boardEvents and conferences
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.8.2jQuery UI 1.12.1ModernizrGoogle AnalyticsEthicalAds
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure search form with GET method

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
EthicalAds
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is the official Python programming language site maintained by the Python Software Foundation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a:mail.wooz.org ip4:188.166.95.178/32 ip6:2a03:b0c0:2:d0::71:1 include:stspg-customer.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+shb8ybr70a3@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

28 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.python.org
Issuer:GlobalSign Atlas R3 DV TLS CA 2025 Q1
Valid Until:4/13/2026 (219 days)
SANs:www.python.org, *.python.org, python.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2759 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.64.223, 151.101.192.223, 151.101.0.223, 151.101.128.223
AAAA Records:2a04:4e42:200::223, 2a04:4e42::223, 2a04:4e42:600::223, 2a04:4e42:400::223
Name Servers:
ns-1134.awsdns-13.org
ns-2046.awsdns-63.co.uk
ns-484.awsdns-60.com
ns-981.awsdns-58.net
MX Records:
50: mail.python.org
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a:mail.wooz.org ip4:188.166.95.178/32 ip6:2a03:b0c0:2:d0::71:1 include:stspg-customer.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ~all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a mature technology stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Modernizr, and Google Analytics, combined with EthicalAds for advertising. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good accessibility and SEO practices. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The technical implementation reflects a stable and modern infrastructure suitable for a high-traffic community site. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy mechanisms to align with best practices.
Analyze Another Website