Skip to main content

Is qemetica.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Ciech S.A. Reviews

qemetica.com favicon

Is qemetica.com Safe? Security Analysis for Ciech S.A.

Check if qemetica.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingPolandlarge
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotMicrosoft Clarity
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 8:39:52 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Qemetica, formerly known as CIECH, is a leading chemical industry company based in Poland, offering advanced chemical manufacturing solutions and technologies. The website reflects a professional corporate presence targeting industrial and business customers in the chemical sector. The company positions itself as a market leader with a broad portfolio of chemical products and a focus on innovation. Technically, the website employs modern tools such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security policies and advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC. Overall, the site is well-structured, compliant with GDPR, and demonstrates good privacy practices, though it could improve transparency around incident response and security frameworks.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotMicrosoft Clarity

๐Ÿง AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically chemicals, with a large organizational size and a history linked to the CIECH brand. The business model focuses on chemical production and supply to industrial clients. The website indicates a structured group with subsidiaries and a clear branding strategy. The use of multiple marketing and analytics platforms suggests active engagement in digital marketing and customer insights. The absence of direct contact information on the main site may indicate a preference for controlled communication channels or a focus on B2B relationships. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like LinkedIn, Google, and Meta for marketing and analytics.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor security gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and consent management adds to the security and privacy compliance. The site would benefit from publishing a security policy and incident response information to enhance trust and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

โœจObservations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ciech S.A.

Description:

Qemetica โ€“ formerly CIECH, a leader in the chemical industry offering modern solutions and advanced technologies.

Key Services:
Chemical manufacturingAdvanced chemical technologiesIndustrial chemical products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotMicrosoft Clarity
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsMeta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking Pixels:
Meta PixelMicrosoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

๐Ÿ‘คGDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

๐Ÿ“งEmail Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:213.189.49.112 ip4:213.189.49.113 ip4:213.189.49.114 ip4:213.189.49.115 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:1s0ngt8b@ag.eu.dmarcian.com

๐Ÿ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

๐Ÿ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:185.49.148.35
Name Servers:
ns1.ciechgroup.comDNS only
ns1.qemetica.comDNS only
ns2.ciechgroup.comDNS only
ns2.qemetica.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: qemetica-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072304, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:213.189.49.112 ip4:213.189.49.113 ip4:213.189.49.114 ip4:213.189.49.115 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

โšกNetwork Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

๐Ÿ”งTechnical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with deferred loading of scripts, indicating performance optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, respectively, and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain registrar is a known provider. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers.
Analyze Another Website