Skip to main content

Is qfxl.net a Scam? Security Check Results - 安徽省起帆电线电缆有限公司 Reviews

Is qfxl.net Safe? Security Analysis for 安徽省起帆电线电缆有限公司

Check if qfxl.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyChinaenterprise
jQuerySwiper.jsWOW.jsBaidu Tongji Analytics
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 6:30:33 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

安徽省起帆电线电缆有限公司 is a large-scale enterprise specializing in the production and sales of power cables, with multiple production bases in Shanghai, Anhui, and Hubei. The company is publicly listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (stock code 605222) and boasts a strong market position with a registered capital exceeding 15 billion RMB and an annual production capacity over 100 billion RMB. Their product portfolio includes low voltage, high voltage, fire-resistant, and special cables, serving sectors such as power, construction, metallurgy, railway, and aviation. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive product and company information primarily in Chinese.

Detected Technologies

jQuerySwiper.jsWOW.jsBaidu Tongji Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates a vertically integrated business model focusing on cable manufacturing and distribution. It leverages its multiple production bases to ensure supply chain efficiency and rapid delivery, including customized cable production with short lead times. The firm holds numerous certifications and patents, reinforcing its competitive advantage. Its target customers are industrial and commercial clients requiring high-quality cable products. The company maintains partnerships with related industry players and has a strong presence in the Chinese market, supported by its public listing and substantial market capitalization.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

400*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and includes no visible sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information, which are important for transparency and trust. No cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating partial privacy compliance. The use of third-party analytics (Baidu Tongji) introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, privacy notices, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

安徽省起帆电线电缆有限公司

Description:

安徽省起帆电线电缆有限公司是上海起帆电缆股份的一级代理商,拥有上海起帆、安徽池州起帆、湖北宜昌起帆三大生产基地,注册资金超15亿元,年生产能力超100亿元,专注电缆生产研发30多年,产品广泛应用于电力、建筑、冶金、铁路、航空等领域。

Key Services:
电力电缆生产电缆研发定制电缆供应技术支持与服务
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuerySwiper.jsWOW.jsBaidu Tongji Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage inferred (site uses https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Tongji
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Tongji
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

16 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2118 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:139.196.182.233
Name Servers:
ns1.cnolnic.net
ns2.cnolnic.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom CMS with common JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and WOW.js for animations. It integrates Baidu Tongji for analytics. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and keywords. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security best practices such as security headers are missing. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Analyze Another Website