Skip to main content

Is qgiv.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Qgiv, Inc. Reviews

Q

Is qgiv.com Safe? Security Analysis for Qgiv, Inc.

Check if qgiv.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitN/amedium
Google Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityHubSpot AnalyticsFacebook PixelMarketo Munchkin+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 1:02:29 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Qgiv, Inc. operates a comprehensive fundraising platform tailored for nonprofit organizations, offering a suite of tools including donation forms, event registration, text-to-donate, peer-to-peer fundraising, auction management, donor management (CRM), and data analytics. Positioned as a key player in the nonprofit fundraising technology sector, Qgiv leverages its association with parent company Bloomerang to enhance market credibility. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and Marketo, supporting extensive user tracking and data-driven marketing strategies. Security posture is robust, featuring HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the platform presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly experience for its target audience of nonprofit fundraisers.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityHubSpot AnalyticsFacebook PixelMarketo MunchkinIntellimizeBizible

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Qgiv's market positioning as a specialized fundraising platform for nonprofits is reinforced by its comprehensive service offerings and integration capabilities. The business model is SaaS-based, focusing on recurring revenue from nonprofit clients. The platform's ecosystem includes partnerships such as GiveCon, a fundraising conference, and its parent company Bloomerang, which likely provides strategic and operational support. The website content and structure emphasize customer success, live feedback, and community engagement, which are key competitive advantages. The use of advanced marketing tools and analytics indicates a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. Growth indicators include active promotion of webinars, resources, and client testimonials. The absence of detailed WHOIS data suggests a need for improved transparency in domain registration, though this does not currently detract significantly from business credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@qgiv.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements essential security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy, reflecting adherence to best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact information represents a gap in transparency and preparedness. The extensive use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Qgiv, Inc.

Description:

Raise more money and reach new supporters with Qgiv, a robust fundraising platform made specifically for fundraisers.

Key Services:
Donation FormsEvent RegistrationText-to-DonatePeer-to-Peer FundraisingAuction FundraisingDonor Management (CRM)Data, Reports, & StatisticsIntegrations
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityHubSpot AnalyticsFacebook PixelMarketo MunchkinIntellimizeBizible
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login portal

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityHubSpot AnalyticsBizibleMarketo Munchkin
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMicrosoft ClarityHubSpot AnalyticsBizible
Marketing Tools:
Marketo MunchkinIntellimize
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional fundraising platform targeting nonprofits.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 888-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_s00776982.autospf.email -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(888-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:blj34ipo@ag.us.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:blj34ipo@fr.us.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(112 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.236.194.130
Name Servers:
ns-1384.awsdns-45.org
ns-1562.awsdns-03.co.uk
ns-184.awsdns-23.com
ns-581.awsdns-08.net
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:112ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_s00776982.autospf.email -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website utilizes a modern technology stack with integrations including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, Marketo Munchkin, Bizible, and Intellimize, supporting advanced marketing automation and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, contributing to excellent user experience. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Technical risks include dependency on numerous external services which require vigilant security management. Opportunities exist to streamline scripts for improved performance and to enhance technical documentation for compliance and security transparency.
Analyze Another Website