Skip to main content

Is qhho.com a Scam? Security Check Results - qhho.com Reviews

Q

Is qhho.com Safe? Security Analysis for 滑动验证

Check if qhho.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 11:10:27 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website qhho.com currently presents a slider CAPTCHA verification page, indicating that access to the actual website content is blocked by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security mechanism. This prevents direct analysis of the business, services, or detailed content. The domain is registered since 2011 with a reputable registrar and shows no privacy protection, suggesting transparency in registration data. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of privacy or contact information limits the ability to assess the company's market position or business model. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript for the slider verification and links externally to a Baota Cloud WAF service, indicating some level of security infrastructure. Security posture is weak from the visible content perspective due to lack of HTTPS confirmation and security headers in the provided data. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for full analysis and scores low on content quality and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the WAF challenge page, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the website content. The domain age and registrar information suggest a stable registration history. The external link to Baota Cloud WAF indicates the site uses third-party security services. No information on business sector, services, or partnerships is available from the current content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The presence of a slider CAPTCHA indicates an active WAF or security mechanism protecting the site from automated access or attacks. However, no security headers or HTTPS status are provided, limiting the assessment of the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is available. The site lacks visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The security score is low due to limited accessible data and missing best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Remove or configure WAF challenge to allow legitimate access for analysis and user experience.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The page is a slider CAPTCHA verification indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access to content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a slider CAPTCHA verification.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 28 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:47.109.109.39
Name Servers:
ns1.ename.netDNS only
ns2.ename.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: api.dxdu.cn
SOA:Serial: 1751342656, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:207ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom slider CAPTCHA implemented in JavaScript with inline CSS styling. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The external script is loaded from the same domain. The site links externally to bt.cn, a known provider of Baota Cloud WAF services. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but user experience is poor due to access blocking. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of metadata and structured data. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website