Skip to main content

Is qiyukf.net a Scam? Security Check Results - qiyukf.net Reviews

Q

Is qiyukf.net Safe? Security Analysis for 404 Not Found

Check if qiyukf.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:31:29 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at qiyukf.net currently serves only a 404 Not Found error page, indicating that the site content is inaccessible or missing. There is no metadata, structured data, or business-related content available to analyze. The domain is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. since 2015, which suggests a legitimate registration, but the lack of website content limits any meaningful business or security assessment. Technically, the site lacks any detectable technologies, scripts, or security headers, and no HTTPS or SSL information is available from the provided data. Security posture is weak due to absence of security best practices and policies. Overall, the site appears inactive or under construction, with no privacy, cookie, or contact information present, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of any business content or metadata, no insights into market positioning, business model, or services can be derived. The domain age suggests it has been registered for several years, but the lack of active content or contact details indicates minimal or no current business operations. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor given the lack of HTTPS information, security headers, or any visible security policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site does not implement privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, but the site is non-functional, which itself is a risk for trust and user experience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a functional website with proper content and navigation to improve user experience and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible beyond a 404 error page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

35/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(807 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:111.124.204.233, 111.124.204.225
Name Servers:
lofterns1.netease.com
lofterns3.netease.com
lofterns4.netease.com
SOA:Serial: 20200637, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:174ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently lacks any detectable technology stack or CMS. The hosting provider is Alibaba Cloud Computing, which is reputable. The site returns a minimal HTML 404 error page generated by nginx, indicating a basic server setup without additional application layers. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The absence of meta tags and SEO elements suggests poor search engine visibility. Technical debt is high as the site is non-functional and lacks modern web standards.
Analyze Another Website