Skip to main content

Is qqxiaoji.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 小鸡网赚博客 Reviews

qqxiaoji.com favicon

Is qqxiaoji.com Safe? Security Analysis for 小鸡网赚博客

Check if qqxiaoji.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationChinamedium
WordPress 6.6.2jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiper.js+3 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:52:36 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

小鸡网赚博客是一家专注于分享国内各大网站创业方法及网赚项目的中文博客,提供付费教程、会员资源下载及活动线报,面向互联网创业者和网赚爱好者。网站采用WordPress平台,技术栈包括jQuery、Bootstrap和FontAwesome,支持移动端优化和良好的SEO实践。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,使用了验证码机制,但缺少安全头部和隐私合规的完整实现。WHOIS信息缺失,域名注册状态不明,影响整体信任度。建议加强安全头部配置和隐私合规措施以提升安全与合规水平。

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.6.2jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiper.jsLazyLoad imagesCustom JS for emoji support and captchaPHP backend (implied by WordPress)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

网站定位于网赚教育和资源分享,采用会员付费和广告合作的商业模式,拥有活跃的内容更新和付费阅读机制。目标客户为互联网创业者和内容创作者,市场定位明确,内容丰富且专业。合作伙伴包括多个相关资源网站。缺乏公开的公司注册信息和联系方式,影响企业透明度。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

351*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站使用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,集成了多种验证码防护机制以防止自动化攻击。缺少安全头部配置如CSP、HSTS等,未发现安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道。WHOIS信息缺失增加潜在风险。建议完善安全策略,定期更新系统和插件,建立漏洞响应流程。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

配置并启用安全HTTP头部(如Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS)

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

小鸡网赚博客

Description:

小鸡网赚博客专注分享国内各大网站会员收费网赚项目,网赚教程,网赚资源,帮助用户在互联网找到合适的发财致富项目,轻松赚取互联网第一桶金。

Key Services:
网赚项目教程会员收费教程网赚资源下载活动线报分享软件工具及源码分享
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.6.2jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiper.jsLazyLoad imagesCustom JS for emoji support and captchaPHP backend (implied by WordPress)
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of captcha and slider captcha scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Chinese language blog focused on internet entrepreneurship and paid tutorials.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:160.202.237.201
Name Servers:
barlow.dnspod.netDNS only
hammer.dnspod.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1752142008, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:703ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress 6.6.2,使用主流前端框架和库,支持响应式设计和移动端访问。页面结构清晰,SEO优化良好,加载性能适中。缺少部分现代安全配置和隐私合规功能。无明显技术债务,但WHOIS信息缺失可能影响域名稳定性和信任。建议持续技术更新和安全加固。
Analyze Another Website