Skip to main content

Is r1autorent.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - R1 Autorent Reviews

r1autorent.lv favicon

Is r1autorent.lv Safe? Security Analysis for R1 Autorent

Check if r1autorent.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
jQueryjQuery UIGoogle Maps APIGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:15:58 AM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

R1 Autorent is a Latvian vehicle rental company specializing in buses, light cars, and trucks. The company targets general consumers and businesses needing transportation solutions within Latvia and potentially Europe. Their website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and social media presence, positioning them as a small but established local player in the transportation rental market. The business model focuses on direct vehicle rental services with online booking capabilities. Technically, the website employs common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Maps API, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility features. The presence of tracking scripts indicates moderate user data collection, though privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and exposes a Google Maps API key in the source code, which could be a risk. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security certifications are evident. Overall, the security posture is average with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards. The overall risk is moderate; the business appears legitimate and operational, but the lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies, combined with some security gaps, suggests the need for enhanced compliance and security measures to build greater trust and reduce potential risks.

Detected Technologies

jQueryjQuery UIGoogle Maps APIGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsYouTube Player APIFancybox

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

R1 Autorent operates in the transportation sector, focusing on vehicle rentals including buses, light vehicles, and trucks. The company appears to be a small-sized local business founded around 2014, serving customers primarily in Latvia with options for travel within the Baltics and Europe. Their competitive advantage lies in a diversified fleet and localized service with physical offices in Riga and Ulbroka. Revenue streams likely come from rental fees and additional services such as after-hours delivery surcharges. The company maintains an online presence with booking forms and social media engagement, indicating a moderate digital maturity. Partnerships include the use of schedulebull.com for booking infrastructure. Growth indicators are limited but the company maintains consistent branding and contact availability. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving digital compliance and expanding online marketing to enhance market reach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@r1autorent.lv

Phone Numbers (3)

+3712653****
+3716761****
265*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The exposure of the Google Maps API key without visible restrictions could lead to unauthorized usage. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which may delay mitigation of security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts without clear user consent further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security culture appears informal and would benefit from formalized policies, technical hardening, and transparency to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

R1 Autorent

Description:

R1 Autorent provides car rental services including buses, light cars, and trucks.

Key Services:
Bus rentalLight car rentalTruck rental
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryjQuery UIGoogle Maps APIGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsYouTube Player APIFancybox
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:spf.schedulebull.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:postmaster@r1autorent.lv

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:87.99.76.50
Name Servers:
ns1.schedulebull.comDNS only
ns2.schedulebull.comDNS only
ns3.schedulebull.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: mail.schedulebull.com
SOA:Serial: 2020080406, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:126ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:spf.schedulebull.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web technology stack centered around jQuery and jQuery UI for UI components, Google Maps API for location services, and Google Analytics with Tag Manager for tracking and analytics. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously, which helps performance but also introduces dependency on third-party services. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph). However, no modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The hosting provider is not identifiable from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced technical features such as structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO or security headers for improved protection. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website