Skip to main content

Is r2s.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Rīgas 2. pamatskola Reviews

R

Is r2s.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rīgas 2. pamatskola

Check if r2s.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationLatviamedium
WordPressOxygen BuilderElementorjQueryGoogle Maps API+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:24:19 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rīgas 2. pamatskola is a specialized primary school located in Riga, Latvia, focusing on education for students with intellectual disabilities and severe intellectual disabilities. Established in 1925, it offers both basic and professional education programs, including vocational training in areas such as hospitality, commerce, construction, and catering. The school actively participates in European educational projects like Erasmus+ and eTwinning, enhancing its educational offerings and international collaboration. The website is well-structured, primarily in Latvian, and provides clear contact information and relevant educational content targeted at students and their families. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Oxygen and Elementor page builders, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Maps API, and Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some minor backend issues like PHP warnings in certain sections were detected. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for the educational institution, with no signs of malicious content or security blocking. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Strategic improvements include fixing backend errors, enhancing security headers, and implementing explicit cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and security posture.

Detected Technologies

WordPressOxygen BuilderElementorjQueryGoogle Maps APIContact Form 7SwiperJSFancybox

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The school operates as a public educational institution serving a niche market of students with special educational needs in Riga. Its long history since 1925 and participation in EU-funded projects position it as a reputable entity within the Latvian education sector. The business model is likely government-funded, focusing on delivering specialized education and vocational training. The website supports this by providing detailed program information, contact channels, and engagement through social media platforms. Growth indicators include ongoing project participation and digital presence enhancements. The partnership ecosystem includes Erasmus+ and eTwinning networks, which enhance educational quality and international cooperation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

r*****@riga.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716714****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. Visible PHP warnings in the HTML source indicate potential backend misconfigurations that could expose sensitive information or lead to vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy and cookie notice, though the cookie consent mechanism is not explicit. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with better backend hygiene and enhanced security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Fix PHP warnings and broken links in the professional education program section to prevent information leakage and improve user experience.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rīgas 2. pamatskola

Description:

A specialized primary school in Riga, Latvia, providing education for students with intellectual disabilities and severe intellectual disabilities, offering both basic and professional education programs including practical skills and vocational training.

Key Services:
Basic education programs for students with intellectual disabilitiesProfessional education programs including hospitality, commerce, construction, and cateringPreschool educationExtracurricular activitiesParticipation in projects like Erasmus+ and eTwinning
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressOxygen BuilderElementorjQueryGoogle Maps APIContact Form 7SwiperJSFancybox
Frameworks:
OxygenElementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is for Rīgas 2. pamatskola, a specialized primary school in Riga, Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 28 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:213.175.126.235
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1713509045, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Oxygen and Elementor page builders, leveraging jQuery and Google Maps API for interactive features. Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA is used for form handling, providing basic spam protection. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses SwiperJS and Fancybox for UI components. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Some technical debt is evident from PHP warnings embedded in the HTML, indicating backend code issues that require developer attention. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires maintenance to fix backend errors and improve security configurations.
Analyze Another Website