Is raceagainstdementia.com Safe? Security Analysis for Race Against Dementia
https://raceagainstdementia.comCheck if raceagainstdementia.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Race Against Dementia is a non-profit organization dedicated to raising funds and awareness for innovative dementia research. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform targeting donors, researchers, and the general public interested in combating dementia. The organization leverages partnerships, including Formula 1, to enhance its visibility and impact. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Visual Website Optimizer, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or terms of service pages, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and branding suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The organization occupies a niche within the healthcare non-profit sector, focusing on dementia research funding. Its competitive advantage lies in its association with high-profile ambassadors and Formula 1 partnerships, which help drive fundraising and awareness. The business model centers on donations, fundraising events, and partnerships. The target audience includes individuals affected by dementia, donors, researchers, and corporate partners. Growth indicators include active content updates and engagement tools. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers for analytics and marketing but no explicit business partners were identified in the content. Strategic observations suggest the organization could improve trust and compliance by publishing privacy and security policies and providing clear contact information.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Company Registration
company number 09973676
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicate gaps in security best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks comprehensive privacy documentation. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with better transparency and technical controls.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service with clear links on the website.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Race Against Dementia
Race Against Dementia are driven to raise money to fund breakthrough and innovative dementia research. 1 in 3 people born today will die with dementia.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent banner implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security and privacy plugins
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 66 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about raceagainstdementia.com
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published