Skip to main content

Is rarible.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Rarible Reviews

rarible.org favicon

Is rarible.org Safe? Security Analysis for Rarible

Check if rarible.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
Framer (site generator)Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)Google Fonts
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:13:33 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rarible.org is a technology-focused website offering a fast, multichain NFT API infrastructure service targeting developers and businesses requiring NFT data across Ethereum, Base, Polygon, and other blockchains. The website presents a professional design with good SEO metadata and Open Graph integration, indicating a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure leverages Framer for site generation and Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, ensuring reliable performance and HTTPS security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for improvement in technical security hardening. The security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the lack of published privacy, cookie, and security policies, as well as contact information, limits transparency and compliance confidence. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and reflects a legitimate business with consistent WHOIS registration data. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Framer (site generator)Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)Google Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Rarible operates in the NFT and blockchain technology sector, providing API services that facilitate access to NFT data across multiple chains. Its business model centers on offering free API keys to attract developers and enterprises, positioning itself as a fast and reliable infrastructure provider. The company is US-based, founded in 2020, aligning with the domain registration date. The website targets a technical audience, primarily developers and businesses in the blockchain ecosystem. While the site lacks explicit contact and trust signals such as certifications or testimonials, its consistent branding and domain registration support its credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The company appears to focus on growth through API adoption and multichain support, which is a competitive advantage in the evolving NFT market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface from user input vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations. The lack of contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) further limits incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. To improve, the company should implement security best practices, publish relevant policies, and enable DNSSEC.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rarible

Description:

Rarible API is the fastest NFT API infrastructure. Access data for Ethereum, Base, Polygon and +10 chains. Get your free API keys now.

Key Services:
NFT data accessMultichain API supportFree API keys
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (site generator)Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)Google Fonts
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional API service platform for NFT data.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(322 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.161.6, 31.43.160.6
Name Servers:
buck.ns.cloudflare.com
fay.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382163514, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:163ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and prototyping tool, and is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS and CDN services. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and includes well-structured meta tags for SEO and social media sharing. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and the site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better semantic markup. No CMS was detected, indicating a static or custom-built frontend. The absence of forms reduces complexity but also limits user interaction capabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website