Skip to main content

Is raum.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - raum.lv Reviews

R

Is raum.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if raum.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:00:01 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website raum.lv currently serves a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page, blocking direct access to its content. This indicates that the site is protected against automated bots and potentially malicious traffic, but also means no business or product information is directly accessible. The site uses outdated CMS versions as indicated by meta tags, which may pose security risks if these are actually in use. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information is available, limiting trust and transparency. The security posture shows some strengths in bot mitigation but lacks modern security headers and clear compliance indicators. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible without CAPTCHA completion, limiting comprehensive analysis and lowering trust and credibility scores.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security challenge page and lack of accessible content, no clear business information, market positioning, or revenue model can be determined. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja, a security service, suggesting prior security concerns or abuse. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links are present. The meta tags reference Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated CMS platforms, possibly indicating legacy infrastructure or misconfiguration. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further reduces business credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 and BitNinja security challenge to prevent automated access, which is a positive security measure. However, the absence of security headers, outdated CMS references, and lack of visible privacy or security policies indicate gaps in security maturity. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of domain legitimacy and registrant information. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The security score is moderate but limited by the blocking mechanism and lack of transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update CMS platforms to supported and secure versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website is serving a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking direct access until CAPTCHA is solved.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This website is currently serving a security CAPTCHA challenge page to validate visitors and prevent automated/bot access. It is not presenting business or product information.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to prevent automated access

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible without solving CAPTCHA

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:213.227.132.36 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: raum.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071901, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:137ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:213.227.132.36 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated by meta tags, which are outdated and potentially insecure. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The site is protected by BitNinja security challenge, which blocks access until CAPTCHA completion. No modern security headers or advanced SEO features are detected. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The overall technical implementation is basic with significant room for modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website