Is rawgit.com Safe? Security Analysis for Ryan Grove
Check if rawgit.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
RawGit was a small hobby project created by Ryan Grove in 2014 to serve raw files from GitHub repositories with proper Content-Type headers. The service gained unexpected popularity, serving billions of requests and consuming large bandwidth, but was sunsetted in 2018 due to abuse and lack of maintenance resources. The website now serves as an informational and shutdown notice page with recommendations for alternative services. Technically, the site uses standard HTML5, CSS, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics, hosted under Cloudflare DNS. Security posture is moderate but lacks advanced protections such as DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is minimal with no policies or consent mechanisms present. Business credibility is moderate given the clear ownership and domain legitimacy but limited contact or policy transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
RawGit operated as a free developer utility service targeting software developers and users needing to serve raw GitHub content. Its business model was non-commercial, relying on goodwill and hobbyist maintenance. The project had a niche market position with moderate popularity but no evident revenue streams or partnerships. The shutdown announcement reflects operational challenges and abuse issues. The ecosystem includes links to GitHub and Twitter for source and updates. The company behind it is an individual developer, Ryan Grove, with no parent or subsidiary companies. The service's simplicity and open-source nature limited its scalability and commercial viability.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. HTTPS usage is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. Google Analytics is used without cookie consent, indicating privacy compliance gaps. The site is not blocked by WAF or security challenges, and no malware or phishing indicators are present. Overall, security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small hobby project but insufficient for commercial or sensitive applications.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Ryan Grove
RawGit served raw files directly from GitHub with proper Content-Type headers. It was a free service that allowed users to serve content from GitHub repositories with correct headers.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited set
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a sunset announcement page for a discontinued service.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 63 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings