Skip to main content

Is razorpay.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Razorpay Reviews

razorpay.com favicon

Is razorpay.com Safe? Security Analysis for Razorpay

Check if razorpay.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceIndialarge
JavaScriptSegment AnalyticsAmplitudeCriteoLinkedIn Insight Tag+5 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 7:12:49 AM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Razorpay is a well-established fintech company founded in 2013, providing comprehensive payment solutions primarily targeting businesses and merchants in India. The company offers a suite of payment services including payment gateways, payment links, and support for various payment methods such as UPI, credit/debit cards, and netbanking. The website reflects a mature business with consistent branding and professional content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools such as Segment, Amplitude, and Google Analytics, hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a robust digital maturity. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Sentry for error tracking, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is accessible, well-designed, and trustworthy, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptSegment AnalyticsAmplitudeCriteoLinkedIn Insight TagFacebook PixelSentryMicrosoft ClarityGoogle AnalyticsFramer (for site design)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Razorpay holds a strong market position as a leading payment solution provider in India, serving a large customer base of businesses requiring online payment processing. Its business model revolves around fintech services, generating revenue through transaction fees and value-added payment services. The company demonstrates growth potential through its extensive use of analytics and marketing tools, indicating active customer engagement and data-driven decision-making. The absence of explicit contact information on the website suggests a focus on digital self-service and possibly enterprise client onboarding. The domain age and registration details support the legitimacy and stability of the business. No suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data is present, reinforcing trustworthiness.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@razorpay.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. Use of Sentry for error monitoring and analytics plugins indicates proactive operational monitoring. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which could hinder transparency and trust in security incident handling. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, necessitating careful management and compliance adherence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Razorpay

Description:

Online Payments India: Start Accepting Payments Instantly with Razorpay's Payment Suite, which Supports Netbanking, Credit Card & Debit Cards, UPI etc.

Key Services:
Payment gatewayPayment linksUPI paymentsCredit and debit card processingNetbanking payments
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptSegment AnalyticsAmplitudeCriteoLinkedIn Insight TagFacebook PixelSentryMicrosoft ClarityGoogle AnalyticsFramer (for site design)
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Use of Sentry for error tracking

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
SegmentAmplitudeGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoft ClaritySentry
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Criteo
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagMicrosoft ClarityAmplitude
Marketing Tools:
Segment AnalyticsAmplitude
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern analytics and tracking tools extensively

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:fdspfus.freshemail.io include:fdspfeuc.freshemail.io include:fdspfind.freshemail.io include:fdspfaus.freshemail.io ip4:167.89.0.0/17 ip4:208.117.48.0/20 ip4:50.31.32.0/19 ip4:198.37.144.0/20 ip4:198.21.0.0/21 ip4:192.254.112.0/20 ip4:168.245.0.0/17 ip4:149.72.0.0/16 ip4:159.183.0.0/16 ip4:223.165.113.0/24 ip4:223.165.115.0/24 ip4:223.165.118.0/23 ip4:223.165.120.0/23 ip4:40.92.0.0/15 ip4:40.107.0.0/16 ip4:52.100.0.0/15 ip4:52.102.0.0/16 ip4:52.103.0.0/17 ip4:104.47.0.0/17 ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48 ip6:2a01:111:f403::/49 ip6:2a01:111:f403:8000::/51 ip6:2a01:111:f403:c000::/51 ip6:2a01:111:f403:f000::/52 ip4:34.142.221.122/32 ip4:35.240.151.59/32 exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com ip4:209.61.151.0/24 ip4:166.78.68.0/22 ip4:198.61.254.0/23 ip4:192.237.158.0/23 ip4:23.253.182.0/23 ip4:104.130.96.0/28 ip4:146.20.113.0/24 ip4:146.20.191.0/24 ip4:159.135.224.0/20 ip4:69.72.32.0/20 ip4:104.130.122.0/23 ip4:146.20.112.0/26 ip4:161.38.192.0/20 ip4:143.55.224.0/21 ip4:143.55.232.0/22 ip4:159.112.240.0/20 ip4:198.244.48.0/20 ip4:204.220.168.0/21 ip4:204.220.176.0/20 ip4:141.193.32.0/23 ip4:159.135.140.80/29 ip4:159.135.132.128/25 ip4:161.38.204.0/22 ip4:87.253.232.0/21 ip4:185.189.236.0/22 ip4:185.211.120.0/22 ip4:185.250.236.0/22 ip4:143.55.236.0/22 ip4:198.244.60.0/22 ip4:204.220.160.0/21 -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(369 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.117, 3.174.113.128, 3.174.113.116, 3.174.113.101
Name Servers:
ns-1400.awsdns-47.org
ns-1939.awsdns-50.co.uk
ns-723.awsdns-26.net
ns-74.awsdns-09.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:fdspfus.freshemail.io include:fdspfeuc.freshemail.io include:fdspfind.freshemail.io include:fdspfaus.freshemail.io ip4:167.89.0.0/17 ip4:208.117.48.0/20 ip4:50.31.32.0/19 ip4:198.37.144.0/20 ip4:198.21.0.0/21 ip4:192.254.112.0/20 ip4:168.245.0.0/17 ip4:149.72.0.0/16 ip4:159.183.0.0/16 ip4:223.165.113.0/24 ip4:223.165.115.0/24 ip4:223.165.118.0/23 ip4:223.165.120.0/23 ip4:40.92.0.0/15 ip4:40.107.0.0/16 ip4:52.100.0.0/15 ip4:52.102.0.0/16 ip4:52.103.0.0/17 ip4:104.47.0.0/17 ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48 ip6:2a01:111:f403::/49 ip6:2a01:111:f403:8000::/51 ip6:2a01:111:f403:c000::/51 ip6:2a01:111:f403:f000::/52 ip4:34.142.221.122/32 ip4:35.240.151.59/32 exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com ip4:209.61.151.0/24 ip4:166.78.68.0/22 ip4:198.61.254.0/23 ip4:192.237.158.0/23 ip4:23.253.182.0/23 ip4:104.130.96.0/28 ip4:146.20.113.0/24 ip4:146.20.191.0/24 ip4:159.135.224.0/20 ip4:69.72.32.0/20 ip4:104.130.122.0/23 ip4:146.20.112.0/26 ip4:161.38.192.0/20 ip4:143.55.224.0/21 ip4:143.55.232.0/22 ip4:159.112.240.0/20 ip4:198.244.48.0/20 ip4:204.220.168.0/21 ip4:204.220.176.0/20 ip4:141.193.32.0/23 ip4:159.135.140.80/29 ip4:159.135.132.128/25 ip4:161.38.204.0/22 ip4:87.253.232.0/21 ip4:185.189.236.0/22 ip4:185.211.120.0/22 ip4:185.250.236.0/22 ip4:143.55.236.0/22 ip4:198.244.60.0/22 ip4:204.220.160.0/21 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer for design and heavily integrates modern analytics and marketing technologies including Segment, Amplitude, Criteo, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Analytics. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS servers. The site uses asynchronous and deferred loading of scripts to optimize performance, though overall loading speed is moderate. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are well implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and scalable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy-focused improvements.
Analyze Another Website