Skip to main content

Is rdanami.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - RDA Nami Reviews

rdanami.lv favicon

Is rdanami.lv Safe? Security Analysis for RDA Nami

Check if rdanami.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
jQueryElementorWordPressSiteGround OptimizerFont Awesome+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:10:52 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

RDA Nami is a small Latvian company specializing in residential property management and building maintenance services in Riga. With 20 years of experience, they emphasize a human approach to property care, offering services such as cleaning, landscaping, snow removal, and pest control. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor, indicating a modern but standard technical infrastructure. The site is accessible, uses HTTPS, and provides clear contact information, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. Security headers are not evident, and no advanced security or incident response information is provided. Overall, the business appears legitimate and focused on local property management, but improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices are recommended.

Detected Technologies

jQueryElementorWordPressSiteGround OptimizerFont AwesomeJet ElementsRaven Framework

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets residential property owners and residents in Riga, offering essential property management services. Their business model is service-oriented with a local market focus. The website content and contact details support a trustworthy small business profile. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company leverages common WordPress plugins and hosting likely provided by SiteGround. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact trust and compliance with EU regulations. The company could benefit from enhanced digital marketing and analytics to better understand and grow their customer base.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@rdanami.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712947****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The contact form collects personal data (name, phone, email, message) but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced anti-spam measures are noted. The absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact information indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

RDA Nami

Description:

RDA Nami provides property management and residential building maintenance services with a human approach, boasting 20 years of experience in real estate management. They focus on maintaining and improving clients' properties to allow clients to focus on more important matters.

Key Services:
Building and territory cleaningGrass mowing and leaf collectionPlant care and landscapingSnow removal and ice eliminationPest control (deratization and disinsection)Property maintenance and improvement
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryElementorWordPressSiteGround OptimizerFont AwesomeJet ElementsRaven Framework
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
ElementorJet Elements
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.209.47.217 include:rdanami.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:35.208.224.119
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.netDNS only
ns2.siteground.netDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
10: mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
30: mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
SOA:Serial: 106, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.209.47.217 include:rdanami.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and several plugins including Jet Elements and SiteGround Optimizer, indicating a typical modern small business website setup. The site loads jQuery and Font Awesome libraries and uses Google Fonts for typography. Hosting appears to be with SiteGround, inferred from the optimizer plugin. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but basic ARIA roles and landmarks are used. There is no evidence of advanced technical debt or legacy technology, but security and privacy implementations are lacking.
Analyze Another Website