Skip to main content

Is reboostlux.com a Scam? Security Check Results - reboostlux.com Reviews

reboostlux.com favicon

Is reboostlux.com Safe? Security Analysis for ReBoost

Check if reboostlux.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3Google FontsFont Awesome 5 Free
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:24:54 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 'ReBoost' is a newly registered domain (April 2024) with minimal content and no explicit business description or contact information. The site uses standard web technologies including Google Fonts and Font Awesome, hosted via GoDaddy. There is no evidence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any security or incident response information. The technical infrastructure is basic but mobile optimized. Security posture is limited with no advanced headers or DNSSEC enabled. Overall, the site appears to be in early development or a minimal marketing presence without mature business or security practices.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3Google FontsFont Awesome 5 Free

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of explicit business information, the market positioning, business model, and target audience cannot be confidently determined. The site appears to be a small-scale or startup entity with no visible certifications or trust indicators. The use of LeadConnectorHQ marketing tools suggests a focus on lead generation or marketing services. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The domain age and lack of registrant details reduce credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

f*****@2x.png

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers detected. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No tracking or analytics scripts were found, reducing privacy risks but also limiting business intelligence. Recommendations include implementing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

No explicit business description found in the content. The website appears to be newly created with limited content visible in the HTML provided.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3Google FontsFont Awesome 5 Free
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
LeadConnectorHQ
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is very new and has minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(252 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.140.166
Name Servers:
ns49.domaincontrol.com
ns50.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2024101800, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons. Hosting is via GoDaddy with no advanced CMS or frameworks detected. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal data collection. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security best practices. The site would benefit from modernization including SEO improvements and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website