Skip to main content

Is refund-advantage.com a Scam? Security Check Results - refund-advantage.com Reviews

R

Is refund-advantage.com Safe? Security Analysis for Access Denied

Check if refund-advantage.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:13:16 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.refund-advantage.com is currently inaccessible, presenting an 'Access Denied' error page likely due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security mechanism, inferred from the Akamai EdgeSuite error reference. The domain WHOIS query returned no registration data, indicating the domain may be unregistered, expired, or otherwise unavailable. Consequently, no business, contact, or policy information is accessible for analysis. The lack of accessible content and metadata severely limits the ability to assess the company's business model, technical infrastructure, or security posture. The site exhibits no visible security headers, privacy policies, or contact channels, and no technologies or frameworks can be identified. Overall, the website's digital presence is minimal or non-existent, raising significant concerns about legitimacy and operational status.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible website content and WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model insights. The domain's lack of registration data and inaccessible website suggest the business may not be operational or the domain is not actively maintained. No partnerships or related domains are identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the lack of accessible content and metadata. The presence of a WAF or security blocking mechanism indicates some level of security control, but no details on SSL configuration, security headers, or vulnerability management are available. The absence of privacy policies, contact information for incident response, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further indicates a low maturity level in security and compliance. The domain's missing WHOIS data also raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register and maintain accurate WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Access Denied page served with reference to Akamai EdgeSuite error URL indicating WAF or security blocking.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to access denied error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:167.89.40.157 ip4:50.31.40.113 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mktomail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@refund-advantage.com
Forensic Reports:security@metabank.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:2.23.88.132
Name Servers:
a1-205.akam.netDNS only
a11-66.akam.netDNS only
a2-67.akam.netDNS only
a22-64.akam.netDNS only
a6-65.akam.netDNS only
a7-66.akam.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: refundadvantage-com01e.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1547825494, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:83ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:167.89.40.157 ip4:50.31.40.113 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mktomail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only an access denied error page with no HTML metadata, scripts, or content. The hosting appears to be via Akamai EdgeSuite, indicating use of a CDN or security service. No CMS, frameworks, or technologies are detectable. The lack of content and metadata prevents assessment of performance, SEO, accessibility, or mobile optimization. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, suggesting it is unregistered or expired, which is a critical technical and operational risk.
Analyze Another Website