Skip to main content

Is regen.network a Scam? Security Check Results - Regen Network Reviews

R

Is regen.network Safe? Security Analysis for Regen Network

Check if regen.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyN/amedium
React (Next.js)Google AnalyticsSlick CarouselWritesonic Botsonic widget
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:17:15 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Regen Network operates a specialized platform focused on ecological regeneration and the voluntary carbon credit market. It provides tools and marketplaces for corporations and project developers to buy, trade, and retire high-integrity carbon and biodiversity credits. The company positions itself as a key player in catalyzing climate finance through nature-based solutions. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and Material-UI, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and offers a professional user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks explicit security policies and headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is common and justified for this business type. The website shows strong business credibility and trust indicators through partnerships and clear service offerings.

Detected Technologies

React (Next.js)Google AnalyticsSlick CarouselWritesonic Botsonic widget

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Regen Network targets corporations and ecological project developers interested in sustainable climate solutions. Its business model revolves around facilitating the creation, verification, and trading of ecological credits via digital platforms. The company leverages blockchain technology for transparency and accountability. Partnerships with major organizations like Microsoft and the World Economic Forum enhance its market position. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees and service subscriptions. The platform's ecosystem approach and focus on high-integrity credits provide competitive advantages. Growth indicators include an expanding partner network and active marketplace. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen trust further.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no evident exposure of sensitive information. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The lack of contact information for security incidents reduces incident response readiness. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, enhancing transparency and formalizing security policies would improve the security posture significantly.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Regen Network

Description:

Regen Network provides tools to create standards and market for sustainable companies to buy carbon credits and nature-based solutions to reduce carbon footprint

Key Services:
Regen Marketplace for buying, trading, and retiring ecological creditsRegen Registry for project developers to enroll and verify ecological credits
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React (Next.js)Google AnalyticsSlick CarouselWritesonic Botsonic widget
Frameworks:
Next.jsMaterial-UI
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Writesonic Botsonic widget
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com include:45264802.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:amazonses.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-notify@regen.network

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:35.157.26.135, 63.176.8.218
Name Servers:
dns1.p03.nsone.netDNS only
dns2.p03.nsone.netDNS only
dns3.p03.nsone.netDNS only
dns4.p03.nsone.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1664910617, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com include:45264802.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:amazonses.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including Next.js and Material-UI, providing a responsive and accessible user interface. Integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager enables user behavior tracking, though privacy compliance is limited. The site loads moderately fast with optimized images and uses slick-carousel for UI components. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and security documentation. Opportunities exist to improve SEO and accessibility further by adding structured data and ARIA attributes. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable platform but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website