Skip to main content

Is regulations.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - regulations.gov Reviews

regulations.gov favicon

Is regulations.gov Safe? Security Analysis for Regulations.gov

Check if regulations.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge
Ember.jsGoogle AnalyticsDigitalGov AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:07:37 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Regulations.gov is an official U.S. government website that serves as a centralized platform for accessing federal regulations and submitting public comments. It is positioned as a key government service facilitating transparency and public participation in regulatory processes. The site leverages modern web technologies such as Ember.js and integrates government analytics tools to monitor usage. However, the provided HTML snapshot is minimal, reflecting a single-page application structure with dynamic content loading. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data is incomplete, but the .gov domain strongly supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy, though improvements in privacy compliance and security headers are recommended.

Detected Technologies

Ember.jsGoogle AnalyticsDigitalGov AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates within the government sector, providing essential regulatory information and public engagement tools. Its business model is service-oriented, funded and managed by the U.S. General Services Administration. The target audience includes the general public, policy makers, and stakeholders interested in federal regulations. The site maintains a strong market position as the official federal regulatory portal. While the technical infrastructure is modern, there is room for enhancement in accessibility, SEO, and privacy transparency. The absence of detailed WHOIS data is typical for government domains but should be monitored for consistency. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate to good. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which are recommended for transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is minimal with no visible cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policy links. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Regulations.gov is a U.S. government website that provides a platform for the public to find, review, and submit comments on federal regulations and related documents.

Key Services:
Access to federal regulationsPublic commenting on regulationsSearch and browse regulatory documents
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Ember.jsGoogle AnalyticsDigitalGov AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Ember.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot prevention

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsDigitalGov Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
DigitalGov Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is an official U.S. government regulatory information portal.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:mail.fdms.gov a:mail-dr.fdms.gov include:_epamail.epa.gov include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:gseg.att.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarcreports@gsa.gov
Forensic Reports:dmarcfailures@gsa.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.regulations.gov
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:6/26/2026 (293 days)
SANs:www.regulations.gov, regulations.gov, api.regulations.gov +3 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Potential Subdomain Takeover

HIGH

Subdomain staging.regulations.gov points to unregistered service d1ntjma0cjv8za.cloudfront.net

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(345 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:54.82.37.110, 35.170.217.249, 98.83.75.247
Name Servers:
dns.gsa.gov
dns2.gsa.gov
dns3.gsa.gov
dns4.gsa.gov
dns5.gsa.gov
SOA:Serial: 774895717, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:291ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:mail.fdms.gov a:mail-dr.fdms.gov include:_epamail.epa.gov include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:gseg.att.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Ember.js as its primary front-end framework, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It integrates Google Analytics and DigitalGov analytics for user tracking and performance monitoring. Google reCAPTCHA is implemented for bot mitigation. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and stylesheets, suggesting modular code splitting. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the HTML snapshot. The lack of security headers and privacy policy pages indicates areas for technical improvement to meet best practices and compliance standards.
Analyze Another Website