Skip to main content

Is rehavita.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Rehavita Reviews

rehavita.eu favicon

Is rehavita.eu Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Rehavita

Check if rehavita.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQueryPhotoSwipeGoogle AnalyticsFontello iconsCSS Normalize
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:55:08 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Rehavita is a Latvian-based small e-commerce retailer specializing in rehabilitation and developmental products such as compression socks, kinesiology tapes, sensory toys, and related therapeutic aids. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and product presentation targeting consumers seeking health and developmental support products. The technical infrastructure includes common web technologies like jQuery, PhotoSwipe, and Google Analytics, with HTTPS enforced ensuring secure communication. However, some security best practices such as security headers and incident response information are missing, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with no critical vulnerabilities detected and a legitimate business presence.

Detected Technologies

jQueryPhotoSwipeGoogle AnalyticsFontello iconsCSS Normalize

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on niche rehabilitation and developmental products, serving primarily the Latvian market. Its business model is direct e-commerce sales with product variety and clear pricing. The presence of partner links to local comparison and shopping platforms indicates integration into the regional e-commerce ecosystem. The lack of detailed company contact information on the main page suggests a focus on online sales rather than direct customer service. The website content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a trustworthy user experience. The company appears to be a small-sized entity without visible subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, which are positive security and privacy indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency in case of security incidents. The use of third-party analytics services introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy policies are present. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Rehavita

Description:

Rehavita is an e-commerce business specializing in rehabilitation, therapy, and developmental products including compression socks, kinesiology tapes, sensory development toys, and other related items.

Key Services:
Online sales of rehabilitation and therapy productsProduct information and supportDelivery and payment services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryPhotoSwipeGoogle AnalyticsFontello iconsCSS Normalize
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:81.94.233.3 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:81.94.233.3
Name Servers:
ns1.server2.megasoft.lvDNS only
ns2.server2.megasoft.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.rehavita.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025070305, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:187ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:81.94.233.3 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS platform with a technology stack including jQuery, PhotoSwipe for image galleries, Fontello icons, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site loads asynchronously Google Analytics scripts and uses CSS Normalize for consistent styling. The performance is moderate with some room for optimization, especially for mobile devices where the layout is basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security headers are missing which is a technical risk. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website