Skip to main content

Is reitingi.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - reitingi.lv Reviews

reitingi.lv favicon

Is reitingi.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas reitingi - Ziņas, Jaunumi, Reitingi, Nozares, TOP 100, Pētījumi, Reģistrācija, Arhīvs

Check if reitingi.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaLatviamedium
Bootstrap CSSFontAwesomeGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Adsense+2 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:15:42 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Latvijas reitingi is a Latvian media portal focused on delivering news, rankings, sector reports, and topical information primarily for Latvian-speaking audiences. The website has a well-structured layout with multiple news categories including politics, economy, culture, and technology. It operates as an online media business with advertising as a key revenue stream, evidenced by Google Adsense and an internal ad network. The site demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity, using modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager. Mobile optimization and navigation clarity are good, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and some security best practices observed, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy policy page found in the provided content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website appears legitimate and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security header implementation.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap CSSFontAwesomeGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AdsenseRealTimely.iojQuery (implied by Bootstrap usage)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website serves as a key information source in Latvia for news and rankings, targeting a general Latvian audience interested in current events and sectoral insights. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, supported by Google Adsense and an internal ad network. The site has a consistent brand presence and active social media channels on Facebook and Twitter, enhancing its market reach. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policy may impact user trust and compliance perception. The site appears to be medium-sized with a history dating back to at least 2003, indicating established market presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The content quality and update frequency suggest a stable operation with potential for growth in digital advertising and content services.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

r*****@reitingi.lv
r*****@reitingi.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens, indicating attention to basic web security. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected in the provided HTML, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Adsense introduces typical tracking and potential risk vectors, but no immediate vulnerabilities are evident. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing comprehensive security headers and publishing incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Latvijas reitingi is a Latvian news and information portal providing news, rankings, sector information, top 100 lists, research, and archives focused on Latvia and related topics.

Key Services:
News articlesRankingsSector reportsAdvertising opportunities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap CSSFontAwesomeGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AdsenseRealTimely.iojQuery (implied by Bootstrap usage)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of CSRF token meta tag

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Tracking Pixels:
RealTimely.io
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a Latvian news and rankings portal with extensive topical coverage.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.241.213.246 include:aspmx.googlemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1432-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.183.28, 104.21.18.183
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3033::ac43:b71c, 2606:4700:3030::6815:12b7
Name Servers:
houston.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
rosalie.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.reitingi.lv
SOA:Serial: 2377376847, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.241.213.246 include:aspmx.googlemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. Google Tag Manager and Adsense are integrated for analytics and advertising. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading of images. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or backend technology is explicitly identified from the HTML. Hosting provider details are not available. The site could improve by adding structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website