Skip to main content

Is remilio.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Remilia Corporation Reviews

R

Is remilio.org Safe? Security Analysis for Remilia Corporation

Check if remilio.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
HTML5CSSJavaScriptXMLHttpRequestCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:50:21 AM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Remilio.org represents a niche NFT project focused on a derivative collection of 10,000 digital collectibles inspired by the Milady Maker ecosystem. The business operates under Remilia Corporation, a US-based entity founded in 2022, targeting NFT collectors and crypto enthusiasts with a unique artistic style and community-driven approach. The website content is mature and politically charged, emphasizing a rebellious and provocative brand identity. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies with Cloudflare DNS but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. The absence of contact information and incident response details further reduces trust and security posture. Overall, the site is functional and moderately professional but requires significant improvements in security and compliance to enhance credibility and user trust.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptXMLHttpRequestCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The project leverages the established Milady Maker NFT community to position itself as a derivative and complementary collectible series. Its business model centers on minting and selling a fixed supply of NFTs with unique traits and community engagement. The use of Viral Public License and detailed authorship credits suggests a focus on open collaboration and transparency within its niche. Marketing relies heavily on social media platforms like Twitter and Discord. The project is small in scale but shows potential for growth within the NFT art market. Partnerships with known NFT platforms like Scatter.art and references to Milady Maker strengthen its ecosystem ties. However, the lack of formal policies and contact channels may hinder broader adoption and trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is basic with some domain-level protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, the lack of DNSSEC, absence of HTTPS/SSL details, missing security headers, and no published security or incident response policies represent significant vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also indicate minimal security monitoring. The site does not appear to implement modern security best practices fully, exposing it to potential risks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, increasing legal risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC and verify DNS configurations to prevent DNS spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Remilia Corporation

Description:

Redacted Remilio Babies is a collection of 10,000 neochibi pfpNFTs inspired by and extending the Milady Maker paradigm, targeting the NFT and crypto community with a focus on digital art, memetic culture, and blockchain collectibles. The project emphasizes adolescent energy, reactionary aesthetics, and digital sales tactics within the NFT ecosystem.

Key Services:
NFT mintingDigital collectible salesCommunity engagement and social media marketing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptXMLHttpRequestCloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
45/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
TwitterDiscord
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a niche NFT project derivative of Milady Maker.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(1044 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.248.236.164
Name Servers:
bruce.ns.cloudflare.com
kira.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt1.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
20: alt2.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
30: alt3.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
40: alt4.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
5: gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381741177, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:54ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, using XMLHttpRequest for dynamic content updates. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services but lacks DNSSEC. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected, indicating a lightweight and manually managed site. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO and accessibility features are minimal but present. The site does not use common analytics or tracking tools, reducing complexity but also limiting insights. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance implementations.
Analyze Another Website