Skip to main content

Is rendoks.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Rendoks Reviews

rendoks.lv favicon

Is rendoks.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Rendoks

Check if rendoks.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPress 5.8.10jQueryBootstrapLayerSliderGoogle Tag Manager+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:50:46 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Rendoks is a Latvian company established in 2003 specializing in the sale and installation of PVC windows, wooden windows, doors, gates, and related accessories. The company targets residential and commercial customers in Latvia, offering quality products with personalized consultations and competitive pricing. The website reflects a well-established local business with consistent branding and a clear focus on its core offerings. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and frameworks such as Bootstrap, LayerSlider, and WPML for multilingual support. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and basic security practices in place, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and safe for general audiences, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.8.10jQueryBootstrapLayerSliderGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFont AwesomeSimple Google reCAPTCHAWPML (multilingual plugin)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the real estate-related retail sector, focusing on building materials and installation services. Its long market presence since 2003 suggests stable operations and experience. The business model is primarily B2C with some B2B elements, offering customized solutions and free consultations. The website's content and structure support lead generation through price request forms. The presence of social media and structured data indicates digital marketing efforts. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

r*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

264*****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy pages are available, which limits transparency and preparedness. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files. The site should improve its security headers and provide clearer security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Rendoks

Description:

SIA "Rendoks" Latvijas tirgū ir jau no 2003. gada. Piedāvā kvalitatīvus PVC logus, durvis, vārtus, žalūzijas un saistītos produktus ar individuālu pieeju un konsultācijām.

Key Services:
PVC logiKoka logiDurvis (PVC, koka, metāla, alumīnija)VārtiŽalūzijasLogu aksesuāriLodžiju un lapeņu iestiklošanaVentilācijas un pretuzlaušanas sistēmas
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.8.10jQueryBootstrapLayerSliderGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFont AwesomeSimple Google reCAPTCHAWPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.237.98.22 +ip4:91.237.98.2 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

59 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.237.98.22
Name Servers:
ns1.noc.lvDNS only
ns2.noc.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: rendoks.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:105ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.237.98.22 +ip4:91.237.98.2 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with popular plugins and frameworks such as Bootstrap and LayerSlider. It is multilingual via WPML and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized. However, the lack of advanced security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment.
Analyze Another Website