Skip to main content

Is renewcity.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - ReNewCity Reviews

renewcity.eu favicon

Is renewcity.eu Safe? Security Analysis for ReNewCity

Check if renewcity.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressYoast SEOBootstrap 5Swiper.jsMailerLite+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:34:32 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ReNewCity is a small Latvian real estate development company specializing in the renovation and restoration of historic buildings in Riga, focusing on sustainable urban living concepts such as the 15-minute city. Their business model includes property development and offering investment opportunities in early-stage projects. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies like Bootstrap and Swiper.js, and integrates marketing tools such as MailerLite and Google Tag Manager. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, providing clear contact information and social media presence. Security posture is good with HTTPS and some security plugins, though security headers and explicit policies are lacking. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image aligned with its business focus.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEOBootstrap 5Swiper.jsMailerLiteWP Rocket

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets individuals and investors interested in historic property renovation and sustainable living in Riga. Their niche market position leverages architectural heritage preservation combined with modern living standards. The business model includes direct real estate sales and investment offerings. The website content and structured data reinforce brand consistency and trust. The company maintains an active Instagram presence and uses email marketing for lead generation. No phone contact is provided, which may limit direct customer engagement. The company appears to be in early growth stages with a focus on local market development.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@renewcity.eu

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and employs security plugins to prevent user enumeration, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Forms are secured via MailerLite, but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection is noted. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and incident readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ReNewCity

Description:

ReNewCity focuses on urban development through real estate renovation and development, restoring historic buildings while preserving architectural heritage and providing modern, sustainable living spaces. They offer investment opportunities in early-stage projects and emphasize sustainable, energy-efficient living within a 15-minute city concept.

Key Services:
Historic building renovationReal estate developmentInvestment opportunities in real estate projects
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEOBootstrap 5Swiper.jsMailerLiteWP Rocket
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (Stop User Enumeration)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
MailerLite
Marketing Tools:
MailerLite
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

45/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:4cb621fc6fb94ee59f78a525526445b6@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:renewcity.eu
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/1/2025 (32 days)
SANs:renewcity.eu, *.renewcity.eu

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.160.24, 104.21.9.135
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3036::6815:987, 2606:4700:3032::ac43:a018
Name Servers:
joel.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
joselyn.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2375943623, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a child theme using Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. MailerLite is integrated for email marketing and lead capture. WP Rocket is used for caching and performance optimization. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. DNS prefetching and lazy loading techniques are employed. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though accessibility and security headers could be improved. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website